Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Superbowl Halftime Show Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2010-02-07 7:18 PM

User image

Extreme Veteran
357
1001001002525
Huntington Beach, CA
Subject: Superbowl Halftime Show
Wow, I was incredibly underwhelmed by the Who.  The best part about the show was Zach Starkey's RAF insignia colored cymbals.


2010-02-07 7:21 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Master
2447
200010010010010025
White Oak, Texas
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
No weaker than last year.
2010-02-07 7:22 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Resident Curmudgeon
25290
50005000500050005000100100252525
The Road Back
Gold member
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
Yeah, those boys are showing the mileage. didn't even bust up their instruments.
2010-02-07 7:27 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Expert
1706
1000500100100
NoVA
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
At least the onside kick and ensuing TD drive made up for the halftime show!!!!
2010-02-07 7:30 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
Would you rather have Up With People?
2010-02-07 7:31 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Master
1584
1000500252525
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
I watched the simpsons


2010-02-07 7:32 PM
in reply to: #2660277

User image

Extreme Veteran
494
100100100100252525
DC Metro area
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
The best part was when it was over and my ears stopped bleeding.

How about we stick to booking bands that aren't 80 years old from now on NFL?
2010-02-07 7:32 PM
in reply to: #2660286

User image

Extreme Veteran
357
1001001002525
Huntington Beach, CA
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
pitt83 - 2010-02-07 5:30 PM Would you rather have Up With People?


Quite possibly.
2010-02-07 7:43 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Master
2477
2000100100100100252525
Oceanside, California
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
My mind kept trying to calculate how many social workers' and teachers' annual salaries could have been covered for what The Who got paid.
2010-02-07 7:50 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
SB halftime performers since "nipplegate":
Paul McCartney
Rolling Stones
Prince
Tom Petty
Bruce Springsteen
The Who

Coincidence? I say no.

Edited by jmk-brooklyn 2010-02-07 8:01 PM
2010-02-07 7:56 PM
in reply to: #2660300

User image

Extreme Veteran
845
50010010010025
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
eabeam - 2010-02-07 7:43 PM My mind kept trying to calculate how many social workers' and teachers' annual salaries could have been covered for what The Who got paid.

If that's your take, the whole game... the whole league should be shelved.
I thought the halftime show was okay.  Not my first pick, and they got off to a shaky start (not a Tommy fan) but it was pretty good.
The light show was good and they didn't have a bunch of 'dancers' out there.


2010-02-07 8:10 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Pro
4313
20002000100100100
McKinney, TX
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
Drugs might have helped out.....for both The Who and the viewers.....

2010-02-07 8:32 PM
in reply to: #2660333

User image

Veteran
312
100100100
St. Paul
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
Wow - Pete Townshend definitely showed the years. i though Roger Daltrey seemed alright, all things considered.

I'm not sure anybody will top Prince. That was the best ever, IMO.
2010-02-07 8:48 PM
in reply to: #2660358

User image

Champion
11641
50005000100050010025
Fairport, NY
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
Daltrey still has some good pipes all things considered but they were definitely looking geriatric.
2010-02-07 8:48 PM
in reply to: #2660358

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
Nathanm74 - 2010-02-07 8:32 PM

Wow - Pete Townshend definitely showed the years. i though Roger Daltrey seemed alright, all things considered.

I'm not sure anybody will top Prince. That was the best ever, IMO.


I gotta go with U2 in 2002- post 9/11.
2010-02-07 8:49 PM
in reply to: #2660300

User image

Master
1585
1000500252525
Folsom (Sacramento), CA
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
eabeam - 2010-02-07 5:43 PM My mind kept trying to calculate how many social workers' and teachers' annual salaries could have been covered for what The Who got paid.


Umm... zero. The Who played for free.

Edit: Their travel was paid for however.

Edited by uclamatt2007 2010-02-07 8:51 PM


2010-02-07 8:56 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Champion
8936
50002000100050010010010010025
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
They got free Depends and Geritol for a year.
2010-02-07 8:58 PM
in reply to: #2660300

User image

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
eabeam - 2010-02-07 8:43 PM My mind kept trying to calculate how many social workers' and teachers' annual salaries could have been covered for what The Who got paid.


This is one of the odder posts I've read in quite some time... especially when you consider the fact that there is a thread discussing Super Bowl commercials, a 30-second spot which went for something like $2.5 million.

My mind keeps trying to calculate why you chose this thread to post this semi-rant in.
2010-02-07 9:04 PM
in reply to: #2660367

Iron Donkey
38643
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show

marmadaddy - 2010-02-07 8:48 PM Daltrey still has some good pipes all things considered but they were definitely looking geriatric.

Give a 60 plus year old some credit, people!  Daltrey can still bust those pipes!  Pete can still swing the arm.  So, they OBVIOUSLY showed their age, because THEY ARE OVER 60!!

I'm sure the powers that be tell these performers to keep it to a certain "respective" level or something.

I liked the stage light arrangement.

2010-02-07 9:04 PM
in reply to: #2660367

User image

Champion
6627
5000100050010025
Rochester Hills, Michigan
Gold member
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
marmadaddy - 2010-02-07 9:48 PM Daltrey still has some good pipes all things considered but they were definitely looking geriatric.


Daltrey was Joan Rivers-esque. His crows had their feet pulled, and his grey-d-locks had been tampered with.

Pete was old, fat, and, well, old and fat. And grey. Nice energy, but...c'mon, now.

Harmony was out of the question. Have they ever played together?!

The stage, though, was a highlight. They should have stayed with the wide angle shot....for...the entire time.  
2010-02-07 9:07 PM
in reply to: #2660369

User image

Veteran
312
100100100
St. Paul
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
jmk-brooklyn - 2010-02-07 8:48 PM

Nathanm74 - 2010-02-07 8:32 PM

Wow - Pete Townshend definitely showed the years. i though Roger Daltrey seemed alright, all things considered.

I'm not sure anybody will top Prince. That was the best ever, IMO.


I gotta go with U2 in 2002- post 9/11.


That was nice. We were talking about that show - they had the names of the 9/11 victims scrolling on a screen behind the stage.


2010-02-07 9:17 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Extreme Veteran
513
500
Albuquerque
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
Yawn.

They should hire Prince to do the halftime show every year.  That was such a good show... 
2010-02-07 11:52 PM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Expert
1690
1000500100252525
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
The lasers looked freakin awesome, and Im shocked at all the Who haters. I really enjoyed the show, I was too  busy singing along I guess to notice that they were really that geriatric.
2010-02-08 6:43 AM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Master
2495
2000100100100100252525
Atlanta, Georgia
Silver member
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
It was obvious the vocals were going to suck after about 30 secs..If you didn't like what was going on onstage, why did you watch?

The outrage - YOUR right to the halftime show YOU wanted to see wasn't there! And you had to stay and watch!!
2010-02-08 8:04 AM
in reply to: #2660271

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Superbowl Halftime Show
Seems Daltrey wasn't overly pleased with it either:

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?id=4896568

What's odd to me: In the pregame interview, Pete said the medly was Roger's idea and he aquiesed to it. Now Roger said it was a bad idea? (it is IMHO)

It's an artifact of the venue. It is only 12minutes and it is a TV appearance, not a concert. Maybe if we called it that, the expectations would match the outcome.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Superbowl Halftime Show Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2