login
Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
-
No new posts
|
 2009-03-26 3:46 PM |
Iron Donkey 38643       , Wisconsin |  Subject: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?You're killing me here, dude.  |
| 2009-03-26 3:47 PM in reply to: #2042312 |
Alpharetta, Georgia Bronze member | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? |
| 2009-03-26 3:49 PM in reply to: #2042312 |
Melon Presser 52116 | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? My BT has a built-in spell check ... every time I misspell or typo a word, a little red line appears under it. Maybe the checker only works with certain browsers? |
| 2009-03-26 3:49 PM in reply to: #2042315 |
Pro 3673 MAC-opolis | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? |
| 2009-03-26 3:50 PM in reply to: #2042315 |
Sneaky Slow 8694 Herndon, VA, | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? lisac957 - 2009-03-26 4:47 PM Spell check is techically two words. /ducks Technically is spelled technically. |
| 2009-03-26 3:50 PM in reply to: #2042320 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? W8t what? Me spelz gud... |
| 2009-03-26 3:51 PM in reply to: #2042326 |
Melon Presser 52116 | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM W8t what? Me spelz gud... Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim. |
| 2009-03-26 3:52 PM in reply to: #2042312 |
Pro 3673 MAC-opolis | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? Maybe he meant to spell "gym". There's a workout center somewhere that can't spell. |
| 2009-03-26 3:54 PM in reply to: #2042315 |
| Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? lisac957 - 2009-03-26 3:47 PM Spell check is techically two words. /ducks
Already pointed out by 2 other peeps. |
| 2009-03-26 3:55 PM in reply to: #2042328 |
| Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM W8t what? Me spelz gud... Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim. Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling. |
| 2009-03-26 4:00 PM in reply to: #2042320 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? TriAya - 2009-03-26 4:49 PM My BT has a built-in spell check ... every time I misspell or typo a word, a little red line appears under it. Maybe the checker only works with certain browsers? I think it's a Firefox thing... |
 2009-03-26 4:00 PM in reply to: #2042315 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2009-03-26 4:04 PM in reply to: #2042359 |
| Alpharetta, Georgia Bronze member | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? wgraves7582 - 2009-03-26 4:00 PM lisac957 - 2009-03-26 4:47 PM Spell check is techically two words. /ducks
I hope you mis-typed on purpose Hahaa... pretty awesome huh?!
|
| 2009-03-26 4:36 PM in reply to: #2042312 |
| Pro 6767 the Alabama part of Pennsylvania | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? In the immortal words of Ralph Wiggim: "Me fail english? That's unpossible!" |
| 2009-03-26 4:42 PM in reply to: #2042320 |
| Pro 4909 Hailey, ID | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? TriAya - 2009-03-26 2:49 PM My BT has a built-in spell check ... every time I misspell or typo a word, a little red line appears under it. Maybe the checker only works with certain browsers? You're on a Mac. They are smart enough to have a universal, system wide spell check. Cause Macz rox and spellz goods. |
| 2009-03-26 4:47 PM in reply to: #2042493 |
| Melon Presser 52116 | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? bradword - 2009-03-26 2:42 PM TriAya - 2009-03-26 2:49 PM You're on a Mac. They are smart enough to have a universal, system wide spell check. Cause Macz rox and spellz goods. My BT has a built-in spell check ... every time I misspell or typo a word, a little red line appears under it. Maybe the checker only works with certain browsers? Actually, I'm on a Windows PC. But the trick seems to be using Firefox, not Internet Explorer. |
| 2009-03-26 4:50 PM in reply to: #2042312 |
| Pro 4909 Hailey, ID | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? Well craptastic |
| 2009-03-26 7:04 PM in reply to: #2042312 |
| Champion 7347 SRQ, FL | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? Yeah Firefox has a built in checker. However if you use the rich text editor on BT it doesn't always work. |
| 2009-03-26 9:24 PM in reply to: #2042344 |
| Arch-Bishop of BT 10278 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? 1stTimeTri - 2009-03-26 4:55 PM TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM W8t what? Me spelz gud... Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim. Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling. well if we're getting into spelling, we might as well get into grammar... The phrase above in red should be, "for whom I'm waiting to comment on my bad spelling." You are welcome.
|
| 2009-03-26 9:26 PM in reply to: #2042973 |
| Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? akustix - 2009-03-26 9:24 PM 1stTimeTri - 2009-03-26 4:55 PM TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM W8t what? Me spelz gud... Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim. Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling. well if we're getting into spelling, we might as well get into grammar... The phrase above in red should be, "for whom I'm waiting to comment on my bad spelling." You are welcome.
Preach, I'll help start your own thread and provide the Subject line for you - |
| 2009-03-27 12:59 AM in reply to: #2042312 |
| Veteran 203 , Washington | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? This directed at me? Wht braut thatt one? Iv onle postid leyke thrie thymes thees weak... |
| 2009-03-27 6:05 AM in reply to: #2042312 |
| Giver 18427 | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? Yeah...my work computer won't let me download the iespell utility. And, TECHNICALLY...it's not my spelling...just my typing. As it turns out, I'm a pretty good speller. My typing skillz however...meh. But thanks for yer concern. |
| 2009-03-27 6:38 AM in reply to: #2042973 |
| Pro 6767 the Alabama part of Pennsylvania | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? akustix - 2009-03-26 10:24 PM 1stTimeTri - 2009-03-26 4:55 PM TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM W8t what? Me spelz gud... Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim. Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling. well if we're getting into spelling, we might as well get into grammar... The phrase above in red should be, "for whom I'm waiting to comment on my bad spelling." You are welcome.
Actually, I believe it should read "from whom...", not "for whom". |
| 2009-03-27 8:54 AM in reply to: #2043314 |
| Member 135 | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? gearboy - 2009-03-27 6:38 AM akustix - 2009-03-26 10:24 PM 1stTimeTri - 2009-03-26 4:55 PM TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM W8t what? Me spelz gud... Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim. Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling. well if we're getting into spelling, we might as well get into grammar... The phrase above in red should be, "for whom I'm waiting to comment on my bad spelling." You are welcome.
Actually, I believe it should read "from whom...", not "for whom". Gotta disagree. The speaker is waiting for Jim. Thus, Jim is the person for whom the speaker is waiting.
Edited by CGunz 2009-03-27 8:55 AM |
| 2009-03-27 9:00 AM in reply to: #2042743 |
| Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? TriRSquared - 2009-03-26 8:04 PM Yeah Firefox has a built in checker. However if you use the rich text editor on BT it doesn't always work.
tru dat.
Turn it off and back on and it picks kicks back in. |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK