Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
Show Per page
 
 
of 2
 
 
2009-03-26 3:46 PM

Iron Donkey
38641
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
You're killing me here, dude.


2009-03-26 3:47 PM
in reply to: #2042312

User image

Atlanta, Georgia
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?

Spell check is techically two words.

/ducks

 

2009-03-26 3:49 PM
in reply to: #2042312

User image

Melon Presser
52077
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000252525
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?

My BT has a built-in spell check ... every time I misspell or typo a word, a little red line appears under it. Maybe the checker only works with certain browsers?

2009-03-26 3:49 PM
in reply to: #2042315

User image

Pro
3673
200010005001002525
MAC-opolis
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
lisac957 - 2009-03-26 4:47 PM

Spell check is techically two words.

/ducks

 

Heh....

2009-03-26 3:50 PM
in reply to: #2042315

User image

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Loudoun County, VA
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
lisac957 - 2009-03-26 4:47 PM

Spell check is techically two words.

/ducks

Technically is spelled technically. 

2009-03-26 3:50 PM
in reply to: #2042320

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?

W8t what?  Me spelz gud...



2009-03-26 3:51 PM
in reply to: #2042326

User image

Melon Presser
52077
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000252525
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM

W8t what?  Me spelz gud...

Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim.

2009-03-26 3:52 PM
in reply to: #2042312

User image

Pro
3673
200010005001002525
MAC-opolis
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
Maybe he meant to spell "gym".  There's a workout center somewhere that can't spell.
2009-03-26 3:54 PM
in reply to: #2042315

Iron Donkey
38641
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
lisac957 - 2009-03-26 3:47 PM

Spell check is techically two words.

/ducks

 

Already pointed out by 2 other peeps.

2009-03-26 3:55 PM
in reply to: #2042328

Iron Donkey
38641
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM
Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM

W8t what?  Me spelz gud...

Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim.

Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling.

2009-03-26 4:00 PM
in reply to: #2042320

User image

Pro
4612
20002000500100
MA
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
TriAya - 2009-03-26 4:49 PM

My BT has a built-in spell check ... every time I misspell or typo a word, a little red line appears under it. Maybe the checker only works with certain browsers?

I think it's a Firefox thing...



2009-03-26 4:00 PM
in reply to: #2042315

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2009-03-26 4:04 PM
in reply to: #2042359

Atlanta, Georgia
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
wgraves7582 - 2009-03-26 4:00 PM
lisac957 - 2009-03-26 4:47 PM

Spell check is techically two words.

/ducks

 

I hope you mis-typed on purpose   That is too funny!

Hahaa... pretty awesome huh?!

 

2009-03-26 4:36 PM
in reply to: #2042312

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
In the immortal words of Ralph Wiggim: "Me fail english? That's unpossible!"
2009-03-26 4:42 PM
in reply to: #2042320

Pro
4909
20002000500100100100100
Hailey, ID
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
TriAya - 2009-03-26 2:49 PM

My BT has a built-in spell check ... every time I misspell or typo a word, a little red line appears under it. Maybe the checker only works with certain browsers?



You're on a Mac. They are smart enough to have a universal, system wide spell check.

Cause Macz rox and spellz goods.
2009-03-26 4:47 PM
in reply to: #2042493

Melon Presser
52077
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000252525
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
bradword - 2009-03-26 2:42 PM
TriAya - 2009-03-26 2:49 PM

My BT has a built-in spell check ... every time I misspell or typo a word, a little red line appears under it. Maybe the checker only works with certain browsers?

You're on a Mac. They are smart enough to have a universal, system wide spell check. Cause Macz rox and spellz goods.

Actually, I'm on a Windows PC. But the trick seems to be using Firefox, not Internet Explorer.



2009-03-26 4:50 PM
in reply to: #2042312

Pro
4909
20002000500100100100100
Hailey, ID
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
Well craptastic
2009-03-26 7:04 PM
in reply to: #2042312

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
Yeah Firefox has a built in checker. However if you use the rich text editor on BT it doesn't always work.
2009-03-26 9:24 PM
in reply to: #2042344

Arch-Bishop of BT
10278
50005000100100252525
Pittsburgh
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
1stTimeTri - 2009-03-26 4:55 PM
TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM
Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM

W8t what? Me spelz gud...

Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim.

Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling.

well if we're getting into spelling, we might as well get into grammar...

The phrase above in red should be, "for whom I'm waiting to comment on my bad spelling."

 You are welcome. 

 

 

 

2009-03-26 9:26 PM
in reply to: #2042973

Iron Donkey
38641
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
akustix - 2009-03-26 9:24 PM
1stTimeTri - 2009-03-26 4:55 PM
TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM
Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM

W8t what? Me spelz gud...

Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim.

Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling.

well if we're getting into spelling, we might as well get into grammar...

The phrase above in red should be, "for whom I'm waiting to comment on my bad spelling."

 You are welcome. 

 

 

 

Preach, I'll help start your own thread and provide the Subject line for you -
1TT - will you PLEASE learn me some grammer? (of course I did that on purpose).

2009-03-27 12:59 AM
in reply to: #2042312

Veteran
203
100100
, Washington
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
This directed at me?  Wht braut thatt one?  Iv onle postid leyke thrie thymes thees weak...


2009-03-27 6:05 AM
in reply to: #2042312

Giver
18426
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?

Yeah...my work computer won't let me download the iespell utility. And, TECHNICALLY...it's not my spelling...just my typing. As it turns out, I'm a pretty good speller.

My typing skillz however...meh.

But thanks for yer concern.

2009-03-27 6:38 AM
in reply to: #2042973

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
akustix - 2009-03-26 10:24 PM
1stTimeTri - 2009-03-26 4:55 PM
TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM
Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM

W8t what? Me spelz gud...

Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim.

Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling.

well if we're getting into spelling, we might as well get into grammar...

The phrase above in red should be, "for whom I'm waiting to comment on my bad spelling."

 You are welcome. 

 

 

 

Actually, I believe it should read "from whom...", not "for whom". 

2009-03-27 8:54 AM
in reply to: #2043314

Member
135
10025
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?
gearboy - 2009-03-27 6:38 AM
akustix - 2009-03-26 10:24 PM
1stTimeTri - 2009-03-26 4:55 PM
TriAya - 2009-03-26 3:51 PM
Aikidoman - 2009-03-26 1:50 PM

W8t what? Me spelz gud...

Maybe Phil was talking about the other Jim.

Yes, the "other" Jim, who I'm waiting for to comment on my bad spelling.

well if we're getting into spelling, we might as well get into grammar...

The phrase above in red should be, "for whom I'm waiting to comment on my bad spelling."

 You are welcome. 

 

 

 

Actually, I believe it should read "from whom...", not "for whom". 

Gotta disagree.  The speaker is waiting for Jim.  Thus, Jim is the person for whom the speaker is waiting.

  Sorry to lurk.



Edited by CGunz 2009-03-27 8:55 AM
2009-03-27 9:00 AM
in reply to: #2042743

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck?

TriRSquared - 2009-03-26 8:04 PM Yeah Firefox has a built in checker. However if you use the rich text editor on BT it doesn't always work.

 

tru dat.

 

Turn it off and back on and it picks kicks back in.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Will Jim PLEASE use a spellcheck? Rss Feed  
Show Per page
 
 
of 2