Wife asked an interesting question... (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2013-01-17 9:29 AM in reply to: #4582398 |
Champion 6962 Atlanta, Ga | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... FranzZemen - 2013-01-17 10:09 AM Marvarnett - 2013-01-17 8:33 AM As others have said, that is a very very BAD idea! The recovery alone from this is going to be equivalent to your IM race day (read: 3-4 weeks). There is absolutely no reason to do this workout above, especially if you are looking at a 15+ IM day. In my 5+ years of coaching I have never come across an athlete I have trained, consulted or spoken to that this workout would benefit. Not one. I believe you may want to review what that workouts really calls for. If you're going to do a race simulation, I would recommend a Saturday with a 4500m swim, then an 80 miler at IM effort. Follow that up with a Sunday workout of 50 miles at IM effort and then a 10-12 mile run. The above, IMHO, gives you the necessary confidence (fatigue-wise) and also forces you to address nutrition and the mental aspects of an IM race day while not causing you to have to recover for more than a couple of days. I tend to do race simulations for sprints and olympics. I imagine your advice might be different for those (even if you disagreed with doing race simulations). What would you recommend for the HIM distance? Currently my race simulation is every Sunday, with a 2000 meter swim, about 40 mile bike, and 7 mile run. It seems to not wear on me - but I am interested in the wisdom of doing this. For my Sprint/Olympic distances, it was no drain at all and seemed to be the reason I propelled from zero to age group podium last summer. So every Sunday you are swimming 2k, biking 40 mile and running 7 miles? If you are doing them at race intensity, then you are shooting yourself in the foot when you could be using that time to actually build fatigue resistance vs 'wasting' it on just getting mileage in. That's like the runner who does a 13 mile run every Sunday to get ready for a Half Mary. You never get any faster. A race simulation for a HIM should happen a couple of times max and look something like this: Saturday: Then do a 3-4 mile negative split run with the out being SUPER easy and the home being at HIM effort/pace. Sunday: |
|
2013-01-17 9:52 AM in reply to: #4582311 |
Master 4119 Toronto | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Marvarnett - 2013-01-17 9:33 AM PinkPrincess - 2013-01-17 9:11 AM Bevie - 2013-01-16 10:38 PM Well you should have a couple simulation days thrown in there. 1.5-2 hour swim. 90 minute break. 5-6 six hour bike. 90 minute break. 2-2.5 hour run. At least something sorta like that is what my plan is saying for me. Yep, I did something like this two month out and then a month out from IMLP. Not sure it would have much use for someone looking to PR, but as a first-time Ironman, it REALLY helped my confidence on race day, especially since I did it all on the race courses. I considered it my "secret weapon" for getting to the finish line. As others have said, that is a very very BAD idea! The recovery alone from this is going to be equivalent to your IM race day (read: 3-4 weeks). There is absolutely no reason to do this workout above, especially if you are looking at a 15+ IM day. In my 5+ years of coaching I have never come across an athlete I have trained, consulted or spoken to that this workout would benefit. Not one. I believe you may want to review what that workouts really calls for. If you're going to do a race simulation, I would recommend a Saturday with a 4500m swim, then an 80 miler at IM effort. Follow that up with a Sunday workout of 50 miles at IM effort and then a 10-12 mile run. The above, IMHO, gives you the necessary confidence (fatigue-wise) and also forces you to address nutrition and the mental aspects of an IM race day while not causing you to have to recover for more than a couple of days. this type of day was discussed a lot last summer - i think it was in one of the magazines called the 'Big Day' or something like that. I did not do that. I didn't think it would be all that useful and the logistics would be too annoying. In the lead up to my IM - my longest days were probably the HIM i did at 6:10 and the 7 hour bike to do the full bike distance another day. The training plan did did call for a brick run afterward but my IT band was achy so i skipped it and still had a solid IM. Edited by juniperjen 2013-01-17 9:53 AM |
2013-01-17 9:56 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Pro 6191 | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... For those of you curious about the "big day", here's the article from Joe Friel: http://www.joefrielsblog.com/2010/04/ironman-big-day.html IMO - it can be beneficial for someone who's struggling mentally with the idea of an Ironman. It can be a huge confidence booster - but the needed recovery is significant, and the workout isn't necessary. Edited by ratherbeswimming 2013-01-17 9:56 AM |
2013-01-17 9:59 AM in reply to: #4582442 |
Veteran 629 Grapevine, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Marvarnett - 2013-01-17 9:29 AM FranzZemen - 2013-01-17 10:09 AM Marvarnett - 2013-01-17 8:33 AM As others have said, that is a very very BAD idea! The recovery alone from this is going to be equivalent to your IM race day (read: 3-4 weeks). There is absolutely no reason to do this workout above, especially if you are looking at a 15+ IM day. In my 5+ years of coaching I have never come across an athlete I have trained, consulted or spoken to that this workout would benefit. Not one. I believe you may want to review what that workouts really calls for. If you're going to do a race simulation, I would recommend a Saturday with a 4500m swim, then an 80 miler at IM effort. Follow that up with a Sunday workout of 50 miles at IM effort and then a 10-12 mile run. The above, IMHO, gives you the necessary confidence (fatigue-wise) and also forces you to address nutrition and the mental aspects of an IM race day while not causing you to have to recover for more than a couple of days. I tend to do race simulations for sprints and olympics. I imagine your advice might be different for those (even if you disagreed with doing race simulations). What would you recommend for the HIM distance? Currently my race simulation is every Sunday, with a 2000 meter swim, about 40 mile bike, and 7 mile run. It seems to not wear on me - but I am interested in the wisdom of doing this. For my Sprint/Olympic distances, it was no drain at all and seemed to be the reason I propelled from zero to age group podium last summer. So every Sunday you are swimming 2k, biking 40 mile and running 7 miles? If you are doing them at race intensity, then you are shooting yourself in the foot when you could be using that time to actually build fatigue resistance vs 'wasting' it on just getting mileage in. That's like the runner who does a 13 mile run every Sunday to get ready for a Half Mary. You never get any faster. A race simulation for a HIM should happen a couple of times max and look something like this: Saturday: Then do a 3-4 mile negative split run with the out being SUPER easy and the home being at HIM effort/pace. Sunday: Thanks. I don't go at race intensity but this is really good food for thought as I tune my training for the final 10 weeks. On your side comment, I do a 13 mile long run weekly, but I do it at a backed off pace (yet still challenging) and mostly because I love that run distance. Speed work is where I've been finding my speed up comes from, though at this point with HIM training I'm less concerned about speed and more about volume. |
2013-01-17 10:03 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Expert 1375 McAllen | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Honestly to nail nutrition wouldn't you want to do all three events in one day? Otherwise you get it segmented and your body would start re fueling the second you stop your Saturday session. I'd feel better about a simulation day (which would be all three disciplines one go) would probably look like a 45 min swim, 90mi bike and 15mi run. Or for HIM, half that except with a 56mi bike |
2013-01-17 10:32 AM in reply to: #4581988 |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... I've done "big weekends" (rather than "big days") like this - for me this happens 3 weeks out from the race and is the peak. Taper from here on out. Saturday: 3000-4000yd OWS + 112 mile bike (brick) |
|
2013-01-17 10:48 AM in reply to: #4582559 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... This "big day" thing seems scary to me. Glad I didn't hear that before I trained for mine. The swim is easily 15 min-45 min longer than my IM swim. The bike is about 112 mile - the run is a bit "short" for actual IM run though. So BASICALLY, this is doing an IM to train for an IM. Considering that it takes me a week to recover from an IM, the idea of a "big day" seems bad, bad, bad to me. I would rather train through the week rather than try and knock out a simulated IM just to need to recover for 4-7 days. |
2013-01-17 11:16 AM in reply to: #4582506 |
Master 4119 Toronto | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... odpaul7 - 2013-01-17 11:03 AM Honestly to nail nutrition wouldn't you want to do all three events in one day? Otherwise you get it segmented and your body would start re fueling the second you stop your Saturday session. I'd feel better about a simulation day (which would be all three disciplines one go) would probably look like a 45 min swim, 90mi bike and 15mi run. Or for HIM, half that except with a 56mi bike I used the tune up race - for me its hard to simulate the nerves that go with the swim start. Though for IM training is a long time and over 6 months and usually with changing weather - and hopefully nutrition is being tested throughout. |
2013-01-17 11:29 AM in reply to: #4582559 |
Elite 3779 Ontario | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... lisac957 - 2013-01-17 11:32 AM I've done "big weekends" (rather than "big days") like this - for me this happens 3 weeks out from the race and is the peak. Taper from here on out. Saturday: 3000-4000yd OWS + 112 mile bike (brick) These 2.5hr runs that people keep mentioning seem like they would really take a toll on the body. Is it really that necessary? Good discussion by the way. One of the best in Tri Talk for a while. |
2013-01-17 11:34 AM in reply to: #4582681 |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... GoFaster - 2013-01-17 11:29 AM lisac957 - 2013-01-17 11:32 AM I've done "big weekends" (rather than "big days") like this - for me this happens 3 weeks out from the race and is the peak. Taper from here on out. Saturday: 3000-4000yd OWS + 112 mile bike (brick) These 2.5hr runs that people keep mentioning seem like they would really take a toll on the body. Is it really that necessary? Good discussion by the way. One of the best in Tri Talk for a while. For me, yes. I can't speak for others. |
2013-01-17 11:41 AM in reply to: #4582681 |
Veteran 629 Grapevine, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... GoFaster - 2013-01-17 11:29 AM I would not do 2.5 hrs. Man was not made to pound that long on a regular basis. I cap at 2 hrs or less. A HM distance at an easy pace (just m under 9 min per mile in my case) fits well into that time for me. I can usually recover fast enough (as in get mobility/energy) to do a light workout 8 to 12 hours out. By the next day, back to "normal". Of course, I've built up to that. Incidentally Higdon' s book calls for a HM long run when prepping for a HM. For a marathon, he has a special formula and it isn't 26 miles.lisac957 - 2013-01-17 11:32 AM I've done "big weekends" (rather than "big days") like this - for me this happens 3 weeks out from the race and is the peak. Taper from here on out. Saturday: 3000-4000yd OWS + 112 mile bike (brick) These 2.5hr runs that people keep mentioning seem like they would really take a toll on the body. Is it really that necessary? Good discussion by the way. One of the best in Tri Talk for a while. |
|
2013-01-17 12:06 PM in reply to: #4581988 |
Veteran 930 Morgan Hill, California | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... I did a big day leading up to IM Arizona last year. For me, a big day was a Metric Ironman, meaning about 2400 meter swim, 112k bike, and 26k run. I did take breaks in between but not the 90 minutes suggested in the book. This was a good confidence builder, some good things learned about nutrition, and at that part of my buildup did not require too much recovery. I did it on a Saturday, took Sunday off, and did not swim until Monday evening. I did the day at or slightly below race pace. My longest bike ride was a 7 hour, 105 mile ride with 8k in climbing. I did several days of 95-100 miles on terrain more similar to the Arizona course. Now, how did this translate to race day? I think I still had more to learn about nutrition. I needed even more bike fitness. I don't think I ate enough on the bike. Neither the Big Day nor the long bike rides got me really prepared for about the 9-10 hour mark of race day. That is when I started to struggle. For me, the struggle was not about run fitness. I started to struggle at about mile 11 of the run, and I had run over 11 miles dozens of times in training. I think this was about bike fitness and nutrition. I felt pretty good coming off the bike and for the first 75-85 minutes of the run, but after that it came crashing down pretty quickly. I finished in 13:19 and had a goal of under 13. So, what did I learn about Big Days, long days and nutrition for my next effort? For me, I don't think you can spend too much time on the bike. Of course, you need to build up to it, but i my next go (IM Texas 2014), I'll do multiple 8+ hour days on the bike. Not multiple as in 6-7, but multiple as in 2-3. Plus, more 100+ mile days. I'll focus less on building up my long run. I was really focused on building my long run up to 20 miles. I didn't make it because I got hurt, so I think too much focus on long runs. Next time, I'll build up to a long run of 18, but focus more on getting a few more in the 15 mile range, but not so focused on those last miles to get to 20. For me, the second half of the marathon was not about run fitness, but about pacing, nutrition, bike fitness. I think a Big Day can have a place in the training up to an Ironman. But I think one has to think about what the goals are for your longest day of training. Pacing, nutrition, fitness, mental strength are all things to be addressed in training. Recovery, consistency, and injury risk are factors to consider in deciding what the longest day of training will be. Now, take that for what its worth. I am not a coach, and have done a grand total of one Ironman. |
2013-01-17 7:52 PM in reply to: #4582756 |
Extreme Veteran 1986 Cypress, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... kmac1346 - 2013-01-17 12:06 PM my next go (IM Texas 2014), I'll do multiple 8+ hour days on the bike. Not multiple as in 6-7, but multiple as in 2-3. Plus, more 100+ mile days. Why??? It's not going to hurt you (besides your a$$/taint/nether regions) but I'm not seeing how it's going to help you much either. Slogging along at very low zone 1 for eight hours will do next to absolutely nothing for you from a fitness perspective. You'd be better off riding for 4-6 hours and using that other 2-4 hours recovering, sleeping, getting a massage, etc. Seriously. |
2013-01-17 9:31 PM in reply to: #4583560 |
Veteran 389 sacramento, Colorado | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... GMAN 19030 - 2013-01-17 5:52 PM I guess my question to this is where is the cutoff and how is it determined? I'm fairly sure any riding is better than none...but how do we know 4-6 is better than 2-4 or 8+?Thanks. (believe me I don't want to spend an extra hour on the bike if it isn't doing me any good)kmac1346 - 2013-01-17 12:06 PM my next go (IM Texas 2014), I'll do multiple 8+ hour days on the bike. Not multiple as in 6-7, but multiple as in 2-3. Plus, more 100+ mile days. Why??? It's not going to hurt you (besides your a$$/taint/nether regions) but I'm not seeing how it's going to help you much either. Slogging along at very low zone 1 for eight hours will do next to absolutely nothing for you from a fitness perspective. You'd be better off riding for 4-6 hours and using that other 2-4 hours recovering, sleeping, getting a massage, etc. Seriously. |
2013-01-17 9:43 PM in reply to: #4581992 |
Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Kido - 2013-01-16 7:38 PM Depending on your plan but probably a 6-7 hr ride. Some will add an hour run in after. I don't think I ever had more than a 7 hr day or so. 7 hour day,,,,,,,,, I barely do that in a week! Kido, never having done an IM when you do your long bike as you mentioned with a possible run after how do the days before and after that look. I mean to you build so you are somewhat fatigued before the long ride or do you take it easy? Same question for the day after..... To the OP good luck with your IM and the training!! |
2013-01-17 9:46 PM in reply to: #4581988 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Six-hour ride followed by an easy *slower than normal* two-hour run. I think. |
|
2013-01-17 9:49 PM in reply to: #4583693 |
Veteran 629 Grapevine, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... kingofbanff - 2013-01-17 9:31 PM This is a dumb question. It would depend on one's level of fitness, intensity goals, the weather, the training plan, and so many other factors. There is no one answer. If you can ride 8 hours straight, you should know that. GMAN 19030 - 2013-01-17 5:52 PM I guess my question to this is where is the cutoff and how is it determined? I'm fairly sure any riding is better than none...but how do we know 4-6 is better than 2-4 or 8+?Thanks. (believe me I don't want to spend an extra hour on the bike if it isn't doing me any good)kmac1346 - 2013-01-17 12:06 PM my next go (IM Texas 2014), I'll do multiple 8+ hour days on the bike. Not multiple as in 6-7, but multiple as in 2-3. Plus, more 100+ mile days. Why??? It's not going to hurt you (besides your a$$/taint/nether regions) but I'm not seeing how it's going to help you much either. Slogging along at very low zone 1 for eight hours will do next to absolutely nothing for you from a fitness perspective. You'd be better off riding for 4-6 hours and using that other 2-4 hours recovering, sleeping, getting a massage, etc. Seriously. Edited by FranzZemen 2013-01-17 9:49 PM |
2013-01-17 9:52 PM in reply to: #4581988 |
Champion 5312 Calgary | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... Most people think it is stupid but I say the best bang for your buck is the triple brick 3 X (40km bike + 10km run) It is harder than the IM but hurts your body less. From "one and he is done" Darren. |
2013-01-17 9:53 PM in reply to: #4583693 |
Extreme Veteran 1986 Cypress, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... kingofbanff - 2013-01-17 9:31 PM GMAN 19030 - 2013-01-17 5:52 PM I guess my question to this is where is the cutoff and how is it determined? I'm fairly sure any riding is better than none...but how do we know 4-6 is better than 2-4 or 8+?Thanks. (believe me I don't want to spend an extra hour on the bike if it isn't doing me any good)kmac1346 - 2013-01-17 12:06 PM my next go (IM Texas 2014), I'll do multiple 8+ hour days on the bike. Not multiple as in 6-7, but multiple as in 2-3. Plus, more 100+ mile days. Why??? It's not going to hurt you (besides your a$$/taint/nether regions) but I'm not seeing how it's going to help you much either. Slogging along at very low zone 1 for eight hours will do next to absolutely nothing for you from a fitness perspective. You'd be better off riding for 4-6 hours and using that other 2-4 hours recovering, sleeping, getting a massage, etc. Seriously. That's going to be highly individual and highly dependent on targeted goals. There's generally no right answer. But I know riding eight hours by default is going to be at a very, very slow pace. Training stress will probably be no different than a 6 hour ride at IM pace. So what did that two hours get you if say the TSS for the two was the same? For example, I have never, ever done a training ride over 4:30. I have ridden over 100 miles three times... in my three Ironman races. I pretty much know what my TSS will be for an IM race so I make sure to hit my IM TSS number (or get darn close to it) during my 4:00 to 4:30 training rides. I certainly can't cover 112 in 4:00-4:30 (my IM bike splits are 5:15) so that means riding at a pace a fair bit higher than I would in an IM to get the TSS numbers I want. My IM pace might be at 70% FTP so my 4:15 training ride might be closer to 80% to get the training stress "similar" to what I'll do on race day for 112 miles or 5:15. That's a long winded way of saying there's a way to equivalently stress the body with a shorter workout. I'd much rather ride 4:00 at 80% than 6:00 at 60%. Edited by GMAN 19030 2013-01-17 9:55 PM |
2013-01-17 9:57 PM in reply to: #4583716 |
Pro 4824 Houston | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... FranzZemen - 2013-01-17 9:49 PM You are really telling a poster on Beginner Triathlete they are asking a dumb question? This is a sincere question by someone seeking advice, you might want to take it down a notch.kingofbanff - 2013-01-17 9:31 PM This is a dumb question. It would depend on one's level of fitness, intensity goals, the weather, the training plan, and so many other factors. There is no one answer. If you can ride 8 hours straight, you should know that. GMAN 19030 - 2013-01-17 5:52 PM I guess my question to this is where is the cutoff and how is it determined? I'm fairly sure any riding is better than none...but how do we know 4-6 is better than 2-4 or 8+?Thanks. (believe me I don't want to spend an extra hour on the bike if it isn't doing me any good)kmac1346 - 2013-01-17 12:06 PM my next go (IM Texas 2014), I'll do multiple 8+ hour days on the bike. Not multiple as in 6-7, but multiple as in 2-3. Plus, more 100+ mile days. Why??? It's not going to hurt you (besides your a$$/taint/nether regions) but I'm not seeing how it's going to help you much either. Slogging along at very low zone 1 for eight hours will do next to absolutely nothing for you from a fitness perspective. You'd be better off riding for 4-6 hours and using that other 2-4 hours recovering, sleeping, getting a massage, etc. Seriously. |
2013-01-17 9:57 PM in reply to: #4583721 |
Master 2005 South Florida | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... BigDH - 2013-01-17 10:52 PM Most people think it is stupid but I say the best bang for your buck is the triple brick 3 X (40km bike + 10km run) It is harder than the IM but hurts your body less. From "one and he is done" Darren. 7 oI've done a triple brick similar to this...but with descending miles on the run...all at IM pace...doesn't look so hard on paper but man it's a ball buster! Longest training day I think was a 7 hour ride. I loved it! Lots of interesting perspectives here. |
|
2013-01-17 9:58 PM in reply to: #4583710 |
Extreme Veteran 1986 Cypress, TX | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... mr2tony - 2013-01-17 9:46 PM Six-hour ride followed by an easy *slower than normal* two-hour run. I think. I'd really, really, really re-think that workout. Then I'd really, really, really re-think continuing on with whatever plan or coach recommended that workout. |
2013-01-17 10:05 PM in reply to: #4583716 |
Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... FranzZemen - 2013-01-17 7:49 PM kingofbanff - 2013-01-17 9:31 PM This is a dumb question. It would depend on one's level of fitness, intensity goals, the weather, the training plan, and so many other factors. There is no one answer. If you can ride 8 hours straight, you should know that. GMAN 19030 - 2013-01-17 5:52 PM I guess my question to this is where is the cutoff and how is it determined? I'm fairly sure any riding is better than none...but how do we know 4-6 is better than 2-4 or 8+?Thanks. (believe me I don't want to spend an extra hour on the bike if it isn't doing me any good)kmac1346 - 2013-01-17 12:06 PM my next go (IM Texas 2014), I'll do multiple 8+ hour days on the bike. Not multiple as in 6-7, but multiple as in 2-3. Plus, more 100+ mile days. Why??? It's not going to hurt you (besides your a$$/taint/nether regions) but I'm not seeing how it's going to help you much either. Slogging along at very low zone 1 for eight hours will do next to absolutely nothing for you from a fitness perspective. You'd be better off riding for 4-6 hours and using that other 2-4 hours recovering, sleeping, getting a massage, etc. Seriously. I've been thinking of changing my sig line and thought you might be interested in buying it. Let me know. |
2013-01-17 10:05 PM in reply to: #4582168 |
Elite 3290 Oliver, BC, "Wine Capital of Canada" | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... |
2013-01-17 10:09 PM in reply to: #4583736 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: Wife asked an interesting question... GMAN 19030 - 2013-01-17 9:58 PM mr2tony - 2013-01-17 9:46 PM Six-hour ride followed by an easy *slower than normal* two-hour run. I think. I'd really, really, really re-think that workout. Then I'd really, really, really re-think continuing on with whatever plan or coach recommended that workout. It was the BT beginner IM plan. It worked pretty well for me. I would like to add that one man's ideal plan isn't idea for another. Each athlete should use a training plan or have one made for them that actually works for that individual. Edited by mr2tony 2013-01-17 10:12 PM |
|