Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. (Page 36)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2014-01-27 2:26 PM in reply to: dtoce |
Expert 1260 Norton Shores, MI | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Question on CTL. I started using TP in September or so and did not adjust a starting point for CTL. So, I assume it starts at 0 at that point. Is their a general starting number for CTL that I should use? Does it really matter at this point at 4-5 months in? |
|
2014-01-27 2:40 PM in reply to: rymac |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by rymac Question on CTL. I started using TP in September or so and did not adjust a starting point for CTL. So, I assume it starts at 0 at that point. Is their a general starting number for CTL that I should use? Does it really matter at this point at 4-5 months in? At 4-5months it should have settled in. In a bit less than 2 months actually For the newbies, when we get to the PMC chart, we will give them a little trick so they don't need to wait 50 or so days for it to stabilize. |
2014-01-27 2:42 PM in reply to: rymac |
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by rymac Question on CTL. I started using TP in September or so and did not adjust a starting point for CTL. So, I assume it starts at 0 at that point. Is their a general starting number for CTL that I should use? Does it really matter at this point at 4-5 months in? I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate, but the graphical representation of your CTL rising on the PMC will be misleading. So if using CTL as a point in time metric, 6 weeks out should be fine. If you're monitoring CTL on your PMC as far as how your training load is increasing or decreasing over time, you likely need closer to 12 weeks of data for the graph to be more meaningful. Given that you've got 4-5 months of data, your CTL number should be fine. If you were just starting now, I suppose you could estimate TSS of your workouts prior to when you started uploading power data into TP and manually upload that TSS information to back populate your CTL, ATL, TSB, etc. |
2014-01-27 3:15 PM in reply to: Jason N |
Expert 1260 Norton Shores, MI | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by Jason N Originally posted by rymac Question on CTL. I started using TP in September or so and did not adjust a starting point for CTL. So, I assume it starts at 0 at that point. Is their a general starting number for CTL that I should use? Does it really matter at this point at 4-5 months in? I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate, but the graphical representation of your CTL rising on the PMC will be misleading. So if using CTL as a point in time metric, 6 weeks out should be fine. If you're monitoring CTL on your PMC as far as how your training load is increasing or decreasing over time, you likely need closer to 12 weeks of data for the graph to be more meaningful. Given that you've got 4-5 months of data, your CTL number should be fine. If you were just starting now, I suppose you could estimate TSS of your workouts prior to when you started uploading power data into TP and manually upload that TSS information to back populate your CTL, ATL, TSB, etc. Thanks. I figured I had enough data at this point but thought I would check. |
2014-01-27 4:28 PM in reply to: rymac |
243 Lincoln, Nebraska | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. This may have been addressed somewhere in this forum and I didn't see it or remember it, but can I upload a ride saved on my Garmin that uses speed and GPS and have GC analyze it for power, or do I have to have a power meter for it to work in GC? I have a few races on my Garmin 305 I would love to have analyzed, but figured I needed to have actual power numbers to make them meaningful on GC. |
2014-01-27 4:32 PM in reply to: Jason N |
190 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by Jason N I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure. |
|
2014-01-27 4:47 PM in reply to: RChung |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by RChung Originally posted by Jason N I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure. Jack Mott threw out a value of 50 for each hour on average you do per day. So if you did 30hours per Month, on average = 1 hour per day, seed with 50. |
2014-01-27 4:52 PM in reply to: RChung |
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by RChung Originally posted by Jason N I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure. Which is why I'm in this group. Thanks...always something to learn. |
2014-01-27 5:56 PM in reply to: Jason N |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by Jason N Originally posted by RChung Originally posted by Jason N I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure. Which is why I'm in this group. Thanks...always something to learn. I have to admit while I knew there it was wasn't perfect at 42 days I didn't appreciate how much. So I actually did the math. If you do 50TSS per day for 42 days you would think your CTL is actually 50. It's about 32 after 42 days and 38 after 60 days and 47 after 4 months. Good things we have people double checking us :-) |
2014-01-27 6:44 PM in reply to: marcag |
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by marcag Originally posted by Jason N I have to admit while I knew there it was wasn't perfect at 42 days I didn't appreciate how much. So I actually did the math. If you do 50TSS per day for 42 days you would think your CTL is actually 50. It's about 32 after 42 days and 38 after 60 days and 47 after 4 months. Good things we have people double checking us :-) Originally posted by RChung Originally posted by Jason N I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure. Which is why I'm in this group. Thanks...always something to learn. You mean it's not that simple? Here I thought I had basically learned everything that it took a bunch of guys with PhDs to formulate.
|
2014-01-27 6:54 PM in reply to: crissy_jo |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by crissy_jo This may have been addressed somewhere in this forum and I didn't see it or remember it, but can I upload a ride saved on my Garmin that uses speed and GPS and have GC analyze it for power, or do I have to have a power meter for it to work in GC? I have a few races on my Garmin 305 I would love to have analyzed, but figured I needed to have actual power numbers to make them meaningful on GC. Unfortunately not easily and certainly not accurately. Some analysis could be done with HR but it won't be that accurate :-( |
|
2014-01-27 7:19 PM in reply to: dtoce |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by dtoce -Any comments for 'older' (early 50's) athlete's like myself, on the slippery slope down? I know the question wasn't directed at me, but hey, I'm one of those guys :-) The older you get, the wiser you get. This is all about training smart, |
2014-01-27 11:26 PM in reply to: marcag |
Master 3888 Overland Park, KS | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Week 3 VO2 Max is done. I took those 15x30's at 115% instead of 105%, was curious to see how the 15' at 90% would go. Then ended up running at 95% for the 15'. Should get workout 3 done on Wednesday so I can start week 4. |
2014-01-28 7:38 AM in reply to: reecealan |
Veteran 1677 Houston, Texas | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Week 4, Threshold 1 ride done. I had all kinds of technology issues this morning....couldn't get my computer to pick up my phone's hotspot and then I couldn't get my 910 or TrainerRoad to pair with my PM....pulled the battery and put it back in and it started working, but something was wrong as my easy warm-up pace was showing 250+ watts instead of 125ish. Was starting to think that the early morning wake-up call was going to be for nothing.... But eventually I got things working and was able to do the ride. I'm really liking the 5 minute intervals....they're long enough to settle in and feel like you're doing some decent work, but short enough that I don't get all mentally wigged out by them. I know we're eventually going to be doing longer intervals (the idea of 2x20 at FTP has me ready to curl up in the fetal position!), so I'll try to enjoy these while we have them! |
2014-01-28 7:51 AM in reply to: marcag |
Veteran 441 Maine | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Did Week4 THR-1 last night. Missed the target wattage by a little on a couple of the 5 min intervals but ended up with a TSS of 80 and it felt pretty good. I think increasing the running frequency to 6 days a week over the past month has added some fatigue but overall both run and bike have been good. It was above freezing yesterday and the garage was a toasty 40, it might be time to turn the fan back on!! |
2014-01-28 8:28 AM in reply to: 0 |
Master 3022 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Week 4/ Threshold 1 in the bag. Had trouble getting comfortable with my gearing today. Ended up with bit harder gear and went at around 86 rpm resulting in a bit higher power on the intervals. Target was 213 for the five 5' intervals and I ended up at 214, 215, 219, 220 & 217. TSS came in at 87.5. The drop in power and cadence at around 4 minutes into the workout was me realizing I was getting really hot and figuring out teh fan wasn't on. Had to stop and jump off and crank her up! Definitely feeling the higher FTP% and longer intervals. having to concentrate a lot more on maintaining cadence levels to keep power even. http://connect.garmin.com/activity/437016863 Edited by trisuppo 2014-01-28 8:31 AM (1-28-14 Ride.png) Attachments ---------------- 1-28-14 Ride.png (140KB - 3 downloads) |
|
2014-01-28 9:24 AM in reply to: marcag |
5 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by marcag Good things we have people double checking us :-) Better still is to always read the original source material, e.g.: http://home.trainingpeaks.com/articles/cycling/the-science-of-the-p... Otherwise, you risk things ending up being like the game of telephone, wherein the story becomes distorted w/ each retelling. |
2014-01-28 12:00 PM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 6582 Melbourne FL | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Week 2 Sweetspot completed last night. Legs were fresh after the weekend stomach illness and worked the cadence range during the intervals, nice workout, TSS = 102. Longest trainer ride in forever!
Edited by Donto 2014-01-28 12:02 PM Attachments ---------------- 2014-01-27 BTWK2-SWE.csv (195KB - 2 downloads) |
2014-01-28 12:39 PM in reply to: ligersandtions |
Veteran 1677 Houston, Texas | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Can we talk about LTHR and HR Zones for a minute? I don't remember if we discussed it before, but I was curious how you set your zones. I know Friel's method is to take your average HR over 20 minutes of an all-out 30 minute effort....so I'm going to approximate that as the average HR over my 20 minute test for simplicity. My average HR over that was 168 (max 176), so I think that correlates to LTHR, and thus to the top of Z4 -- is that right? Now the reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to get an idea of where my HR should be on these 5' threshold efforts. For the first 5' effort of Threshold 1, my HR was a bit low, but for intervals 2-5, my HR built up to 161/162, which seems fairly close to my estimated LTHR of 168. Now if I were to attempt to continue to do this threshold effort for 20 minutes (or 60 minutes), is my HR going to level out at some point (say LTHR) or is the fact that these efforts are close to my LTHR after only 5' an indication that my CP is set incorrectly? FWIW, these efforts were tough, but completely manageable. Given more time, I suspect I could have done at least a couple more intervals with no real issue. |
2014-01-28 1:30 PM in reply to: Andrew Coggan |
Master 1927 Guilford, CT | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Thanks for posting that link. This is all very timely for me. I'm glad the CTL question was asked. I also didn't realize Dr. Coggan was a co-creator of Training Peaks. I've learned more than one new thing today. Maybe someone familiar with Training Peaks can answer this (I don't think Golden Cheetah accounts for it), but if you were to hypothetically go on vacation for 10 days and didn't have your bike, but had access to a spin bike and did 6 or 7 workouts, could you enter in proxy data for that period of time to maintain some integrity to your data rather than just letting it all collapse? I know there is an allowance to seed the data from a starting point but wasn't sure what people did for this.....Similar where I may jump in to one of my wife's spin class she teaches and hammer for an hour, I'd rather capture that and estimate 70TSS or something just for the workout to keep it going so it doesn't lose the data. I didn't think Golden Cheetah did this (Marc you probably know?)....it is a reason I stopped really paying attention to it because I'd have once a week or so without power data...but I'm making an effort this year to start fresh and really track this for once. |
2014-01-28 2:08 PM in reply to: 0 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by JAYCT Thanks for posting that link. This is all very timely for me. I'm glad the CTL question was asked. I also didn't realize Dr. Coggan was a co-creator of Training Peaks. I've learned more than one new thing today. Maybe someone familiar with Training Peaks can answer this (I don't think Golden Cheetah accounts for it), but if you were to hypothetically go on vacation for 10 days and didn't have your bike, but had access to a spin bike and did 6 or 7 workouts, could you enter in proxy data for that period of time to maintain some integrity to your data rather than just letting it all collapse? I know there is an allowance to seed the data from a starting point but wasn't sure what people did for this.....Similar where I may jump in to one of my wife's spin class she teaches and hammer for an hour, I'd rather capture that and estimate 70TSS or something just for the workout to keep it going so it doesn't lose the data. I didn't think Golden Cheetah did this (Marc you probably know?)....it is a reason I stopped really paying attention to it because I'd have once a week or so without power data...but I'm making an effort this year to start fresh and really track this for once. You could use hrTSS which would calculate a TSS based on HR. If your zones are properly set and your intervals are relatively stable, I found it to be not bad You can also enter a TSS manually. I am pretty sure you can also do this with GC, but need to double check. Edited by marcag 2014-01-28 2:50 PM |
|
2014-01-28 2:28 PM in reply to: ligersandtions |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by ligersandtions Can we talk about LTHR and HR Zones for a minute? I don't remember if we discussed it before, but I was curious how you set your zones. I know Friel's method is to take your average HR over 20 minutes of an all-out 30 minute effort....so I'm going to approximate that as the average HR over my 20 minute test for simplicity. My average HR over that was 168 (max 176), so I think that correlates to LTHR, and thus to the top of Z4 -- is that right? Now the reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to get an idea of where my HR should be on these 5' threshold efforts. For the first 5' effort of Threshold 1, my HR was a bit low, but for intervals 2-5, my HR built up to 161/162, which seems fairly close to my estimated LTHR of 168. Now if I were to attempt to continue to do this threshold effort for 20 minutes (or 60 minutes), is my HR going to level out at some point (say LTHR) or is the fact that these efforts are close to my LTHR after only 5' an indication that my CP is set incorrectly? FWIW, these efforts were tough, but completely manageable. Given more time, I suspect I could have done at least a couple more intervals with no real issue. I can tell you this. I had my LTHR tested in lab using blood sample where they measure lactate. It was 163bpm. When I did my 20' test and previous tests, the average for the 20' was 164 so your approximation would be pretty close to mine. Last week when we did 5x4' I never got to LTHR. Last interval peaked at 161. Even doing 15' intervals last summer, I don't think I hit LTHR. Yes, if you maintained FTP your LTHR would very slowly go up, probably beyond 168 later. |
2014-01-28 3:34 PM in reply to: marcag |
Veteran 1677 Houston, Texas | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by marcag Originally posted by ligersandtions I can tell you this. I had my LTHR tested in lab using blood sample where they measure lactate. It was 163bpm. When I did my 20' test and previous tests, the average for the 20' was 164 so your approximation would be pretty close to mine. Last week when we did 5x4' I never got to LTHR. Last interval peaked at 161. Even doing 15' intervals last summer, I don't think I hit LTHR. Yes, if you maintained FTP your LTHR would very slowly go up, probably beyond 168 later. Can we talk about LTHR and HR Zones for a minute? I don't remember if we discussed it before, but I was curious how you set your zones. I know Friel's method is to take your average HR over 20 minutes of an all-out 30 minute effort....so I'm going to approximate that as the average HR over my 20 minute test for simplicity. My average HR over that was 168 (max 176), so I think that correlates to LTHR, and thus to the top of Z4 -- is that right? Now the reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to get an idea of where my HR should be on these 5' threshold efforts. For the first 5' effort of Threshold 1, my HR was a bit low, but for intervals 2-5, my HR built up to 161/162, which seems fairly close to my estimated LTHR of 168. Now if I were to attempt to continue to do this threshold effort for 20 minutes (or 60 minutes), is my HR going to level out at some point (say LTHR) or is the fact that these efforts are close to my LTHR after only 5' an indication that my CP is set incorrectly? FWIW, these efforts were tough, but completely manageable. Given more time, I suspect I could have done at least a couple more intervals with no real issue. Okay, so your 4' intervals had you within a few bpm of LTHR, so my 5' intervals having me within a few bpm of LTHR seem that it shouldn't be a huge concern. I know that my HR will level off and creep up much more slowly at some point, but I was feeling slightly concerned that maybe RPE and power output weren't correlating well to expected HR zones. Honestly, one of the big reasons I use HR when I do these intervals is that if I don't, my RPE tends to get skewed. I start to feel like, "OMG, this is WAY too hard....you need to back off!!" But then if I can see my HR is in the mid-150's, I know that I've got TONS of room for it to go up. So it helps me not be a baby about things "feeling hard". RPE seems much more in check when I ride outside....so HR gets more influence inside than it does outside where things feel more in line with what I'm expecting given power output. |
2014-01-28 7:52 PM in reply to: ligersandtions |
1053 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. TH 1 wk 4 done. TSS 96 A bit tired after a swim session, but I pushed through it, and went above the targets a bit. I am getting a bit worried about my next test. HR for the intervals was in the 150s, definitely uncomfortable on the back half of the 5 min intervals. Goal was 98%, did the 5 intervals at 102%,103%, 102%, 102%, and 104%. File attached. (TH1wk4.png) Attachments ---------------- TH1wk4.png (82KB - 5 downloads) activity_437305204.tcx (511KB - 4 downloads) |
2014-01-28 8:08 PM in reply to: ImSore |
92 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Got my Week 4 Threshold 1 in this evening as well. Heart rate says it was not too bad but the legs were feeling it towards the end of each interval. Attached file for viewing pleasure. Enjoy the rest of your evening. Ron Attachments ---------------- Ron-2014-01-28-bt-power-week4-thr-1-679700.tcx (1958KB - 5 downloads) |
|
Shane's (gsmacleod) Coaching Mentor Group - Open Pages: 1 ... 2 3 4 5 | |||
Birkierunner's (Jim Kelley) General + Long Course Group (OPEN) Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 | |||
Slornow and Wannabefaster's Winter Group version 3-CLOSED Pages: 1 ... 72 73 74 75 | |||
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|