BT Development Mentor Program Archives » Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Rss Feed  
Moderators: alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 73
 
 
2014-01-27 2:26 PM
in reply to: dtoce

User image

Expert
1260
10001001002525
Norton Shores, MI
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Question on CTL.

I started using TP in September or so and did not adjust a starting point for CTL.  So, I assume it starts at 0 at that point.  Is their a general starting number for CTL that I should use? Does it really matter at this point at 4-5 months in?



2014-01-27 2:40 PM
in reply to: rymac

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by rymac

Question on CTL.

I started using TP in September or so and did not adjust a starting point for CTL.  So, I assume it starts at 0 at that point.  Is their a general starting number for CTL that I should use? Does it really matter at this point at 4-5 months in?




At 4-5months it should have settled in. In a bit less than 2 months actually

For the newbies, when we get to the PMC chart, we will give them a little trick so they don't need to wait 50 or so days for it to stabilize.
2014-01-27 2:42 PM
in reply to: rymac

User image

Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Originally posted by rymac

Question on CTL.

I started using TP in September or so and did not adjust a starting point for CTL.  So, I assume it starts at 0 at that point.  Is their a general starting number for CTL that I should use? Does it really matter at this point at 4-5 months in?

I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate, but the graphical representation of your CTL rising on the PMC will be misleading.  So if using CTL as a point in time metric, 6 weeks out should be fine.  If you're monitoring CTL on your PMC as far as how your training load is increasing or decreasing over time, you likely need closer to 12 weeks of data for the graph to be more meaningful.

Given that you've got 4-5 months of data, your CTL number should be fine.  If you were just starting now, I suppose you could estimate TSS of your workouts prior to when you started  uploading power data into TP and manually upload that TSS information to back populate your CTL, ATL, TSB, etc.

2014-01-27 3:15 PM
in reply to: Jason N

User image

Expert
1260
10001001002525
Norton Shores, MI
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Originally posted by Jason N

Originally posted by rymac

Question on CTL.

I started using TP in September or so and did not adjust a starting point for CTL.  So, I assume it starts at 0 at that point.  Is their a general starting number for CTL that I should use? Does it really matter at this point at 4-5 months in?

I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate, but the graphical representation of your CTL rising on the PMC will be misleading.  So if using CTL as a point in time metric, 6 weeks out should be fine.  If you're monitoring CTL on your PMC as far as how your training load is increasing or decreasing over time, you likely need closer to 12 weeks of data for the graph to be more meaningful.

Given that you've got 4-5 months of data, your CTL number should be fine.  If you were just starting now, I suppose you could estimate TSS of your workouts prior to when you started  uploading power data into TP and manually upload that TSS information to back populate your CTL, ATL, TSB, etc.

Thanks.  I figured I had enough data at this point but thought I would check.

2014-01-27 4:28 PM
in reply to: rymac

User image


243
10010025
Lincoln, Nebraska
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
This may have been addressed somewhere in this forum and I didn't see it or remember it, but can I upload a ride saved on my Garmin that uses speed and GPS and have GC analyze it for power, or do I have to have a power meter for it to work in GC?

I have a few races on my Garmin 305 I would love to have analyzed, but figured I needed to have actual power numbers to make them meaningful on GC.
2014-01-27 4:32 PM
in reply to: Jason N


190
100252525
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by Jason N
I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate


Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure.


2014-01-27 4:47 PM
in reply to: RChung

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by RChung

Originally posted by Jason N
I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate


Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure.


Jack Mott threw out a value of 50 for each hour on average you do per day.
So if you did 30hours per Month, on average = 1 hour per day, seed with 50.
2014-01-27 4:52 PM
in reply to: RChung

User image

Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Originally posted by RChung
Originally posted by Jason N I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate
Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure.

Which is why I'm in this group.  Thanks...always something to learn.

2014-01-27 5:56 PM
in reply to: Jason N

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by Jason N

Originally posted by RChung
Originally posted by Jason N I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate
Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure.

Which is why I'm in this group.  Thanks...always something to learn.




I have to admit while I knew there it was wasn't perfect at 42 days I didn't appreciate how much. So I actually did the math.
If you do 50TSS per day for 42 days you would think your CTL is actually 50. It's about 32 after 42 days and 38 after 60 days and 47 after 4 months.

Good things we have people double checking us :-)

2014-01-27 6:44 PM
in reply to: marcag

User image

Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Originally posted by marcag
Originally posted by Jason N

Originally posted by RChung
Originally posted by Jason N I believe CTL only uses the past 6 weeks of data, so once you're 6 weeks in, your current CTL number should be accurate
Um, no. The long-term constant defaults to 42, which is why many people think that CTL depends only on the last 42 days (=6 weeks) of training, but that's a misconception. (It's a pretty common misconception so don't feel bad). Events farther back still influence your CTL, so if you want a better picture of CTL you'll want to "seed" it or initiate it with a reasonable ballpark figure.

Which is why I'm in this group.  Thanks...always something to learn.

I have to admit while I knew there it was wasn't perfect at 42 days I didn't appreciate how much. So I actually did the math. If you do 50TSS per day for 42 days you would think your CTL is actually 50. It's about 32 after 42 days and 38 after 60 days and 47 after 4 months. Good things we have people double checking us :-)

You mean it's not that simple?  Here I thought I had basically learned everything that it took a bunch of guys with PhDs to formulate.  

 

2014-01-27 6:54 PM
in reply to: crissy_jo

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by crissy_jo

This may have been addressed somewhere in this forum and I didn't see it or remember it, but can I upload a ride saved on my Garmin that uses speed and GPS and have GC analyze it for power, or do I have to have a power meter for it to work in GC?

I have a few races on my Garmin 305 I would love to have analyzed, but figured I needed to have actual power numbers to make them meaningful on GC.


Unfortunately not easily and certainly not accurately.
Some analysis could be done with HR but it won't be that accurate :-(


2014-01-27 7:19 PM
in reply to: dtoce

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by dtoce
-Any comments for 'older' (early 50's) athlete's like myself, on the slippery slope down?


I know the question wasn't directed at me, but hey, I'm one of those guys :-)

The older you get, the wiser you get. This is all about training smart,

2014-01-27 11:26 PM
in reply to: marcag

User image

Master
3888
20001000500100100100252525
Overland Park, KS
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Week 3 VO2 Max is done. I took those 15x30's at 115% instead of 105%, was curious to see how the 15' at 90% would go. Then ended up running at 95% for the 15'. Should get workout 3 done on Wednesday so I can start week 4.

2014-01-28 7:38 AM
in reply to: reecealan

User image

Veteran
1677
1000500100252525
Houston, Texas
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Week 4, Threshold 1 ride done.  I had all kinds of technology issues this morning....couldn't get my computer to pick up my phone's hotspot and then I couldn't get my 910 or TrainerRoad to pair with my PM....pulled the battery and put it back in and it started working, but something was wrong as my easy warm-up pace was showing 250+ watts instead of 125ish.  Was starting to think that the early morning wake-up call was going to be for nothing....

But eventually I got things working and was able to do the ride.  I'm really liking the 5 minute intervals....they're long enough to settle in and feel like you're doing some decent work, but short enough that I don't get all mentally wigged out by them.  I know we're eventually going to be doing longer intervals (the idea of 2x20 at FTP has me ready to curl up in the fetal position!), so I'll try to enjoy these while we have them!

2014-01-28 7:51 AM
in reply to: marcag

User image

Veteran
441
10010010010025
Maine
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Did Week4 THR-1 last night. Missed the target wattage by a little on a couple of the 5 min intervals but ended up with a TSS of 80 and it felt pretty good. I think increasing the running frequency to 6 days a week over the past month has added some fatigue but overall both run and bike have been good.

It was above freezing yesterday and the garage was a toasty 40, it might be time to turn the fan back on!!
2014-01-28 8:28 AM
in reply to: 0

User image

Master
3022
20001000
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Week 4/ Threshold 1 in the bag. Had trouble getting comfortable with my gearing today. Ended up with bit harder gear and went at around 86 rpm resulting in a bit higher power on the intervals. Target was 213 for the five 5' intervals and I ended up at 214, 215, 219, 220 & 217. TSS came in at 87.5.

The drop in power and cadence at around 4 minutes into the workout was me realizing I was getting really hot and figuring out teh fan wasn't on. Had to stop and jump off and crank her up! Definitely feeling the higher FTP% and longer intervals. having to concentrate a lot more on maintaining cadence levels to keep power even.


http://connect.garmin.com/activity/437016863

Edited by trisuppo 2014-01-28 8:31 AM




(1-28-14 Ride.png)



Attachments
----------------
1-28-14 Ride.png (140KB - 3 downloads)


2014-01-28 9:24 AM
in reply to: marcag


5

Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by marcag
Good things we have people double checking us :-)


Better still is to always read the original source material, e.g.:

http://home.trainingpeaks.com/articles/cycling/the-science-of-the-p...

Otherwise, you risk things ending up being like the game of telephone, wherein the story becomes distorted w/ each retelling.
2014-01-28 12:00 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Pro
6582
50001000500252525
Melbourne FL
Gold member
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Week 2 Sweetspot completed last night.  Legs were fresh after the weekend stomach illness and worked the cadence range during the intervals, nice workout, TSS = 102. Longest trainer ride in forever!

 



Edited by Donto 2014-01-28 12:02 PM




Attachments
----------------
2014-01-27 BTWK2-SWE.csv (195KB - 2 downloads)
2014-01-28 12:39 PM
in reply to: ligersandtions

User image

Veteran
1677
1000500100252525
Houston, Texas
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Can we talk about LTHR and HR Zones for a minute?  I don't remember if we discussed it before, but I was curious how you set your zones.  I know Friel's method is to take your average HR over 20 minutes of an all-out 30 minute effort....so I'm going to approximate that as the average HR over my 20 minute test for simplicity.  My average HR over that was 168 (max 176), so I think that correlates to LTHR, and thus to the top of Z4 -- is that right?

Now the reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to get an idea of where my HR should be on these 5' threshold efforts.  For the first 5' effort of Threshold 1, my HR was a bit low, but for intervals 2-5, my HR built up to 161/162, which seems fairly close to my estimated LTHR of 168.  Now if I were to attempt to continue to do this threshold effort for 20 minutes (or 60 minutes), is my HR going to level out at some point (say LTHR) or is the fact that these efforts are close to my LTHR after only 5' an indication that my CP is set incorrectly?

FWIW, these efforts were tough, but completely manageable.  Given more time, I suspect I could have done at least a couple more intervals with no real issue. 

2014-01-28 1:30 PM
in reply to: Andrew Coggan

User image

Master
1927
100050010010010010025
Guilford, CT
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Thanks for posting that link.

This is all very timely for me. I'm glad the CTL question was asked.

I also didn't realize Dr. Coggan was a co-creator of Training Peaks. I've learned more than one new thing today.

Maybe someone familiar with Training Peaks can answer this (I don't think Golden Cheetah accounts for it), but if you were to hypothetically go on vacation for 10 days and didn't have your bike, but had access to a spin bike and did 6 or 7 workouts, could you enter in proxy data for that period of time to maintain some integrity to your data rather than just letting it all collapse? I know there is an allowance to seed the data from a starting point but wasn't sure what people did for this.....Similar where I may jump in to one of my wife's spin class she teaches and hammer for an hour, I'd rather capture that and estimate 70TSS or something just for the workout to keep it going so it doesn't lose the data. I didn't think Golden Cheetah did this (Marc you probably know?)....it is a reason I stopped really paying attention to it because I'd have once a week or so without power data...but I'm making an effort this year to start fresh and really track this for once.
2014-01-28 2:08 PM
in reply to: 0

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by JAYCT

Thanks for posting that link.

This is all very timely for me. I'm glad the CTL question was asked.

I also didn't realize Dr. Coggan was a co-creator of Training Peaks. I've learned more than one new thing today.

Maybe someone familiar with Training Peaks can answer this (I don't think Golden Cheetah accounts for it), but if you were to hypothetically go on vacation for 10 days and didn't have your bike, but had access to a spin bike and did 6 or 7 workouts, could you enter in proxy data for that period of time to maintain some integrity to your data rather than just letting it all collapse? I know there is an allowance to seed the data from a starting point but wasn't sure what people did for this.....Similar where I may jump in to one of my wife's spin class she teaches and hammer for an hour, I'd rather capture that and estimate 70TSS or something just for the workout to keep it going so it doesn't lose the data. I didn't think Golden Cheetah did this (Marc you probably know?)....it is a reason I stopped really paying attention to it because I'd have once a week or so without power data...but I'm making an effort this year to start fresh and really track this for once.


You could use hrTSS which would calculate a TSS based on HR. If your zones are properly set and your intervals are relatively stable, I found it to be not bad

You can also enter a TSS manually. I am pretty sure you can also do this with GC, but need to double check.

Edited by marcag 2014-01-28 2:50 PM


2014-01-28 2:28 PM
in reply to: ligersandtions

User image

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Originally posted by ligersandtions

Can we talk about LTHR and HR Zones for a minute?  I don't remember if we discussed it before, but I was curious how you set your zones.  I know Friel's method is to take your average HR over 20 minutes of an all-out 30 minute effort....so I'm going to approximate that as the average HR over my 20 minute test for simplicity.  My average HR over that was 168 (max 176), so I think that correlates to LTHR, and thus to the top of Z4 -- is that right?

Now the reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to get an idea of where my HR should be on these 5' threshold efforts.  For the first 5' effort of Threshold 1, my HR was a bit low, but for intervals 2-5, my HR built up to 161/162, which seems fairly close to my estimated LTHR of 168.  Now if I were to attempt to continue to do this threshold effort for 20 minutes (or 60 minutes), is my HR going to level out at some point (say LTHR) or is the fact that these efforts are close to my LTHR after only 5' an indication that my CP is set incorrectly?

FWIW, these efforts were tough, but completely manageable.  Given more time, I suspect I could have done at least a couple more intervals with no real issue. 




I can tell you this.

I had my LTHR tested in lab using blood sample where they measure lactate. It was 163bpm. When I did my 20' test and previous tests, the average for the 20' was 164 so your approximation would be pretty close to mine.

Last week when we did 5x4' I never got to LTHR. Last interval peaked at 161. Even doing 15' intervals last summer, I don't think I hit LTHR.

Yes, if you maintained FTP your LTHR would very slowly go up, probably beyond 168 later.
2014-01-28 3:34 PM
in reply to: marcag

User image

Veteran
1677
1000500100252525
Houston, Texas
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

Originally posted by marcag
Originally posted by ligersandtions

Can we talk about LTHR and HR Zones for a minute?  I don't remember if we discussed it before, but I was curious how you set your zones.  I know Friel's method is to take your average HR over 20 minutes of an all-out 30 minute effort....so I'm going to approximate that as the average HR over my 20 minute test for simplicity.  My average HR over that was 168 (max 176), so I think that correlates to LTHR, and thus to the top of Z4 -- is that right?

Now the reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to get an idea of where my HR should be on these 5' threshold efforts.  For the first 5' effort of Threshold 1, my HR was a bit low, but for intervals 2-5, my HR built up to 161/162, which seems fairly close to my estimated LTHR of 168.  Now if I were to attempt to continue to do this threshold effort for 20 minutes (or 60 minutes), is my HR going to level out at some point (say LTHR) or is the fact that these efforts are close to my LTHR after only 5' an indication that my CP is set incorrectly?

FWIW, these efforts were tough, but completely manageable.  Given more time, I suspect I could have done at least a couple more intervals with no real issue. 

I can tell you this. I had my LTHR tested in lab using blood sample where they measure lactate. It was 163bpm. When I did my 20' test and previous tests, the average for the 20' was 164 so your approximation would be pretty close to mine. Last week when we did 5x4' I never got to LTHR. Last interval peaked at 161. Even doing 15' intervals last summer, I don't think I hit LTHR. Yes, if you maintained FTP your LTHR would very slowly go up, probably beyond 168 later.

Okay, so your 4' intervals had you within a few bpm of LTHR, so my 5' intervals having me within a few bpm of LTHR seem that it shouldn't be a huge concern.  I know that my HR will level off and creep up much more slowly at some point, but I was feeling slightly concerned that maybe RPE and power output weren't correlating well to expected HR zones.

Honestly, one of the big reasons I use HR when I do these intervals is that if I don't, my RPE tends to get skewed.  I start to feel like, "OMG, this is WAY too hard....you need to back off!!"  But then if I can see my HR is in the mid-150's, I know that I've got TONS of room for it to go up.  So it helps me not be a baby about things "feeling hard".  RPE seems much more in check when I ride outside....so HR gets more influence inside than it does outside where things feel more in line with what I'm expecting given power output.

2014-01-28 7:52 PM
in reply to: ligersandtions


1053
10002525
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.

TH 1 wk 4 done. TSS 96

A bit tired after a swim session, but I pushed through it, and went above the targets a bit. I am getting a bit worried about my next test.

HR for the intervals was in the 150s, definitely uncomfortable on the back half of the 5 min intervals. Goal was 98%, did the 5 intervals at 102%,103%, 102%, 102%, and 104%.

File attached.



(TH1wk4.png)



Attachments
----------------
TH1wk4.png (82KB - 5 downloads)
activity_437305204.tcx (511KB - 4 downloads)
2014-01-28 8:08 PM
in reply to: ImSore


92
252525
Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed.
Got my Week 4 Threshold 1 in this evening as well. Heart rate says it was not too bad but the legs were feeling it towards the end of each interval. Attached file for viewing pleasure. Enjoy the rest of your evening.

Ron



Attachments
----------------
Ron-2014-01-28-bt-power-week4-thr-1-679700.tcx (1958KB - 5 downloads)
New Thread
BT Development Mentor Program Archives » Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Rss Feed  
 
 
of 73
 
 
RELATED POSTS

Shane's (gsmacleod) Coaching Mentor Group - Open Pages: 1 ... 2 3 4 5

Started by gsmacleod
Views: 16732 Posts: 116

2014-05-14 7:37 AM Dominion

Birkierunner's (Jim Kelley) General + Long Course Group (OPEN) Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17

Started by Birkierunner
Views: 31037 Posts: 415

2014-05-16 9:06 AM Birkierunner

Slornow and Wannabefaster's Winter Group version 3-CLOSED Pages: 1 ... 72 73 74 75

Started by slornow
Views: 62639 Posts: 1862

2014-05-16 5:48 PM GoldenSprocket

Playmobil31's Group - Open

Started by playmobil31
Views: 65 Posts: 1

2011-12-18 3:37 PM playmobil31

Mentors Needed - INSTRUCTIONS

Started by Ron
Views: 11078 Posts: 1

2006-12-20 4:55 PM Ron
RELATED ARTICLES
date : January 29, 2013
author : Scott Tinley
comments : 0
There are races to prepare for and health to be found and a lot of adventure and release to be sought in the oceans of the world.
 
date : April 15, 2010
author : EndurancePlanet
comments : 0
This month we talk with gsmacleod, aka Coach Shane MacLeod on his coaching philosophy, his approach to gadgets, training plans, missed workouts and strength training.
date : April 23, 2009
author : Team BT
comments : 1
The closed fist drill will ensure that you are pulling with your entire hand and forearm.
 
date : March 4, 2009
author : jasongootman
comments : 0
In this third part, we discuss bike workout types and how they relate to power training. Power analysis of workouts included. Presented by Tri-Hard coaching and Fit Werx.
date : December 3, 2008
author : jasongootman
comments : 0
What is power training? In this first part, learn the terms and definitions associated with power training. Presented by Tri-Hard coaching and Fit Werx.
 
date : October 21, 2008
author : Coach AJ
comments : 1
Training with a power meter will make sure that you are spending every minute on the bike effectively. Racing with a power meter will keep you humble and in your proper zones on race day.
date : April 1, 2008
author : sportfactory
comments : 1
How will a power meter help my cycling training and racing? A few questions and answers will help determine if a power meter will be good for you.
 
date : February 19, 2007
author : Terese Luikens
comments : 0
Find a mentor. Make a list of at least three people that you could approach for help, list your specific needs and then be courageous enough to begin asking.