Other Resources Challenge Me! » Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Rss Feed  
Moderators: the bear, kaqphin, tinkerbeth, D001, k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 33
 
 
2011-11-05 5:43 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

I completed 3 rides this week and instead of doing the optional one I'll be racing cyclocross tomorrow so that should do the trick.

How are the rest of you coming along?



2011-11-05 5:55 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Extreme Veteran
849
50010010010025
San Diego
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

I'm really enjoying this program.  Did the 3 scheduled workouts for the week and then did a hilly 40 miler outside today.  It was one of those perfect morning rides.  

Can't wait for the pain to continue Monday.

2011-11-05 8:39 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Elite
5316
5000100100100
Alturas, California
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
I'm in, was out of town all week but got in some basic 1 hour rides.  Will hit the program in full this week.  I am giving up my winter marathon to devote myself to this plan with integrity!  All my hopes for more speed are here 8). 
2011-11-05 11:22 PM
in reply to: #3835137

User image

Expert
913
500100100100100
Lost in the Evergreens
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

Cranking out sustained power is much harder than any road ride.  Todays 25/30/25 was intense, but i've found if I can relax and lose the tension, I can sustain  the power just long enough.  It's a struggle  but workouts on the edge are the best workouts.  Mind, body and soul are ready for week 2.

Best regards.

2011-11-06 6:08 AM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
I did workouts 1, 3 and 4 of the week.  It was too nice of a day outside on Wednesday to ride indoors and there aren't many nice weather days left around here so my wife and I rode outside instead.  The optional 90' workout was tough at the end!
2011-11-06 4:48 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Can someone please explain what a Garmin speed/cadence sensor would do for me? I have a 305. I have a regular Ploar HRM. I have a KK trainer... but I don't have a PM. I saw some place there was a way to sue speed/cadence to translate that to power. Can't find it now though. Tying to figure out best way to get my tracking down and where I should be in these work out. I know I can use just HR, but also know that has limitations.


2011-11-06 5:07 PM
in reply to: #3835015

User image

Pro
3804
20001000500100100100
Seacoast, NH!
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
JorgeM - 2011-11-05 6:43 PM

I completed 3 rides this week and instead of doing the optional one I'll be racing cyclocross tomorrow so that should do the trick.

How are the rest of you coming along?

Is the optional one always on Sunday?  I got the Tuesday/Thursday/Sunday workouts in...missed Saturday.  So far so good.  Couldn't get as hard of a workout in for the long ride today as I would have wanted to, but it was nice to be outside!

The other two workouts were not necessarily hard, but I was definitely sweating my butt off.  Good stuff.  Looking forward to this week.

2011-11-06 5:09 PM
in reply to: #3835840

User image

Pro
3804
20001000500100100100
Seacoast, NH!
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

powerman - 2011-11-06 5:48 PM Can someone please explain what a Garmin speed/cadence sensor would do for me? I have a 305. I have a regular Ploar HRM. I have a KK trainer... but I don't have a PM. I saw some place there was a way to sue speed/cadence to translate that to power. Can't find it now though. Tying to figure out best way to get my tracking down and where I should be in these work out. I know I can use just HR, but also know that has limitations.

Knowing what cadence produces the best results for you can be beneficial.  I find it better to maintain the same cadence instead of bouncing around all the time.  

2011-11-06 5:16 PM
in reply to: #3835851

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
jgerbodegrant - 2011-11-06 4:09 PM

powerman - 2011-11-06 5:48 PM Can someone please explain what a Garmin speed/cadence sensor would do for me? I have a 305. I have a regular Ploar HRM. I have a KK trainer... but I don't have a PM. I saw some place there was a way to sue speed/cadence to translate that to power. Can't find it now though. Tying to figure out best way to get my tracking down and where I should be in these work out. I know I can use just HR, but also know that has limitations.

Knowing what cadence produces the best results for you can be beneficial.  I find it better to maintain the same cadence instead of bouncing around all the time.  

How so? My cadence is pretty set around 90 +-10. As far as just spinning or knowing the number, I have had cadence computers before and my cadence is pretty consistent so I didn't really care anymore. And just for tracking trainer time I was just going to use time instead of some calculated mile number.

But this is different, and I will get one if it helps keep me at a place, or can be used for intensity levels. I realize it may not be as good as a power meter, but numbers do help consistency... at least for me.

2011-11-06 6:57 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Extreme Veteran
590
500252525
Northern Virginia
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Day 3 on the books.  Much better now that I got a second fan.
2011-11-06 6:58 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Royal(PITA)
14270
50005000200020001001002525
West Chester, Ohio
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Week 1 done.  Took advantage of a gorgeous day and did a long ride outside instead of on the trainer.


2011-11-06 8:45 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Pro
4360
200020001001001002525
Baton Rouge area
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

Week 1 done of the program along with my half mary program.  SRD today and looking forward to week 2!

2011-11-06 11:27 PM
in reply to: #3744433

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
got in 2 of the 4 in week 1, need a better week 2
2011-11-07 6:43 AM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Expert
906
500100100100100
Prattville, AL
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
I am calling a mulligan... starting week 1 over... Embarassed
2011-11-07 7:45 AM
in reply to: #3835861

User image

Elite
3779
20001000500100100252525
Ontario
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
powerman - 2011-11-06 6:16 PM
jgerbodegrant - 2011-11-06 4:09 PM

powerman - 2011-11-06 5:48 PM Can someone please explain what a Garmin speed/cadence sensor would do for me? I have a 305. I have a regular Ploar HRM. I have a KK trainer... but I don't have a PM. I saw some place there was a way to sue speed/cadence to translate that to power. Can't find it now though. Tying to figure out best way to get my tracking down and where I should be in these work out. I know I can use just HR, but also know that has limitations.

Knowing what cadence produces the best results for you can be beneficial.  I find it better to maintain the same cadence instead of bouncing around all the time.  

How so? My cadence is pretty set around 90 +-10. As far as just spinning or knowing the number, I have had cadence computers before and my cadence is pretty consistent so I didn't really care anymore. And just for tracking trainer time I was just going to use time instead of some calculated mile number.

But this is different, and I will get one if it helps keep me at a place, or can be used for intensity levels. I realize it may not be as good as a power meter, but numbers do help consistency... at least for me.

I actually think your cadence swing of +-10 is pretty high.  "My" sweet spot is somewhere around 87 rpms, and if I'm above 92-93 then I'm spinning more, and if I'm on the lower end of the 80's then I'm typically pushing a lot more.  I know that when I do some tougher 100%+ CP efforts during the program, or doing the 20min test, I'll simply have to push a lower cadence with bigger watts because it lets me push with a lower HR than if I tried to do the same at close to 90 rpms.

It's all personal, but knowing your cadence is a good thing because over time you can see what differences lower/higher cadences can have on your power and HR.  And for me, I'm actually quite specific about where I'll keep my cadence depending on the workout.

2011-11-07 11:39 AM
in reply to: #3744433

Veteran
420
100100100100
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
I completed day 1 and also get in a hard 2 hour outdoor ride last week.  I'm hoping to hit all 4 workouts this week.


2011-11-07 12:16 PM
in reply to: #3843415

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
GoFaster - 2011-11-07 6:45 AM
powerman - 2011-11-06 6:16 PM
jgerbodegrant - 2011-11-06 4:09 PM

powerman - 2011-11-06 5:48 PM Can someone please explain what a Garmin speed/cadence sensor would do for me? I have a 305. I have a regular Ploar HRM. I have a KK trainer... but I don't have a PM. I saw some place there was a way to sue speed/cadence to translate that to power. Can't find it now though. Tying to figure out best way to get my tracking down and where I should be in these work out. I know I can use just HR, but also know that has limitations.

Knowing what cadence produces the best results for you can be beneficial.  I find it better to maintain the same cadence instead of bouncing around all the time.  

How so? My cadence is pretty set around 90 +-10. As far as just spinning or knowing the number, I have had cadence computers before and my cadence is pretty consistent so I didn't really care anymore. And just for tracking trainer time I was just going to use time instead of some calculated mile number.

But this is different, and I will get one if it helps keep me at a place, or can be used for intensity levels. I realize it may not be as good as a power meter, but numbers do help consistency... at least for me.

I actually think your cadence swing of +-10 is pretty high.  "My" sweet spot is somewhere around 87 rpms, and if I'm above 92-93 then I'm spinning more, and if I'm on the lower end of the 80's then I'm typically pushing a lot more.  I know that when I do some tougher 100%+ CP efforts during the program, or doing the 20min test, I'll simply have to push a lower cadence with bigger watts because it lets me push with a lower HR than if I tried to do the same at close to 90 rpms.

It's all personal, but knowing your cadence is a good thing because over time you can see what differences lower/higher cadences can have on your power and HR.  And for me, I'm actually quite specific about where I'll keep my cadence depending on the workout.

Thanks... when I say +-10, I mean during regular riding. Don't care much for over 100 and it has to be pretty steep to be under 80.I meant over the years it has not changed much

But I didn't think about cadence on a trainer and staying in a certain spot. I could see the value in that. I do pay attention to what I'm doing when I'm on a spin bike.

2011-11-07 12:42 PM
in reply to: #3835849

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
jgerbodegrant - 2011-11-06 5:07 PM
JorgeM - 2011-11-05 6:43 PM

I completed 3 rides this week and instead of doing the optional one I'll be racing cyclocross tomorrow so that should do the trick.

How are the rest of you coming along?

Is the optional one always on Sunday?  I got the Tuesday/Thursday/Sunday workouts in...missed Saturday.  So far so good.  Couldn't get as hard of a workout in for the long ride today as I would have wanted to, but it was nice to be outside!

The other two workouts were not necessarily hard, but I was definitely sweating my butt off.  Good stuff.  Looking forward to this week.

because of the format to make the program up-loadable to your BT log, I end up setting the workouts on Mon-Wed-Fri and Sat but you can pretty much start the plan on a Tuesday and make it Tue-Thur-Sat-Sun kinda thing.

In the end you want to tweak this to match your schedule. As long as you have around 24hrs in between hard workouts you should be ok. When in doubt, try different days and if you are having trouble completing some workouts you can figure it if having 24hrs between certain workouts is goo and for others you might need more.

i.e. I can recover faster from hard/short sessions but it takes me a few days to recover from long/steady workouts.

2011-11-07 2:42 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

So I am trying to decide on which way to go. Garmin speed/usb and use trainer road, or KK power computer. Each has something different... now I'm trying to decide which will be better for program.

Jorge, I know you said you may be working with Trainerroad, and so might BT. What other options are available to download the program too and use it to do the workouts and track history? Intergating with tracking and programs might be better to go with a the garmin speed sensor.

2011-11-07 4:00 PM
in reply to: #3875189


8

Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

Without question, you should get the Garmin speed sensor and USB ANT+ stick. This combination allows you to do everything the KK power computer does and more.

And yes, TrainerRoad is excellent software for tracking your power on the KK trainer.  It is free during the beta - I'm not sure how much it will cost upon release.

2011-11-07 4:26 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Expert
1192
1000100252525
Oak Creek, WI
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Day 1 of week 2 in the books... Another quick cadence question... I just picked up a computrainer a few weeks ago and I have noticed that my cadence is much lower on it versus when I'm out on the road. I am generally around 90 on the road and I've been consistently about 79 on the CT. My assumption is that the courses I'm riding on the CT are hillier and possibly that is the reason (it's pretty flat near my house)? Just curious if this is normal or if anyone has had a similar experience..??Also, Jorge thanks for the cycling program...


2011-11-07 4:58 PM
in reply to: #3884877

User image

Pro
6582
50001000500252525
Melbourne FL
Gold member
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

Hey All,

There has been a lot of discussion about using speed to train by power on a trainer.  I had previously developed a spreadsheet for the V2 and V3 plans to use with the Kurt Kinetics Road trainer.  To provide another option for those who wish to use this method I modified my spreadsheet to the V4 plan and have attached it for reference. Note from online research I found two instances where the CycleOps Fluid 2 had the same power curve as the KKR based on the power/speed data from Powertap PM's. So I feel comfortable saying that the COF2 trainer can also be used with this spreadsheet.

There is some information provided in the Info tab that the spreadsheet opens with.  If you use it and have any questions feel free to send me a PM or email about it. 





Attachments
----------------
BT Complete Trainer Power Testing V4 - 2011-R0(share).zip (66KB - 40 downloads)
2011-11-07 5:12 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Expert
2355
20001001001002525
Madison, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

2011-11-07 5:18 PM
in reply to: #3889452

User image

Expert
2355
20001001001002525
Madison, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
chasingkona - 2011-11-07 5:12 PM

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

I guess I meant, which ride is the optional ride of the week? I looked at the program notes and it mentioned skipping the optional ride, but it does not list the optional ride for the week?

2011-11-07 5:22 PM
in reply to: #3835861

User image

Pro
3804
20001000500100100100
Seacoast, NH!
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
powerman - 2011-11-06 6:16 PM
jgerbodegrant - 2011-11-06 4:09 PM

powerman - 2011-11-06 5:48 PM Can someone please explain what a Garmin speed/cadence sensor would do for me? I have a 305. I have a regular Ploar HRM. I have a KK trainer... but I don't have a PM. I saw some place there was a way to sue speed/cadence to translate that to power. Can't find it now though. Tying to figure out best way to get my tracking down and where I should be in these work out. I know I can use just HR, but also know that has limitations.

Knowing what cadence produces the best results for you can be beneficial.  I find it better to maintain the same cadence instead of bouncing around all the time.  

How so? My cadence is pretty set around 90 +-10. As far as just spinning or knowing the number, I have had cadence computers before and my cadence is pretty consistent so I didn't really care anymore. And just for tracking trainer time I was just going to use time instead of some calculated mile number.

But this is different, and I will get one if it helps keep me at a place, or can be used for intensity levels. I realize it may not be as good as a power meter, but numbers do help consistency... at least for me.

Right so, I think your question sort of already got answered.  It really is okay to have a large range in cadence if that's what works for you.  You may find it beneficial to find that "sweet spot" for longer distance races and use your gearing to change the power output.  For example, when you approach a hill, you know you will require more power to go up, but you also know that your ideal cadence is 90, so you shift down to keep that optimal cadence and therefore power output consistent.

Hope that's not too confusing.

New Thread
Other Resources Challenge Me! » Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Rss Feed  
 
 
of 33