Triathlon Bike Question
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2011-09-23 1:56 PM |
Member 56 Suwanee, GA | Subject: Triathlon Bike Question I did a fit through Matt & Allen at Podium, which they did a great job! Those in Atlanta will know Matt. He came back with a few bikes that fit me after using his trainer and dialing in my size. He gave me 4 but I only see 2 in my price range preference, he gave me: 1. Cannondale Slice 2. Cervelo P2 3. Parlee TT 4. Scott Plasma Of those I think the Cannondale and Cervelo are in my price range. I have reviewed specs but just am not sure. Main difference in components seems to be 105, SRAM and ultegra. I am temped to go with the Slice 5 or 4 and use the savings on future upgrades like wheels. Any feedback from the group?
Also note I can get the Slice 5 2011 for ~$1500, Slice 4 for $2k and a cervelo p2 for ~$2400. The plasma frameset is $2k alone and the Parlee is $3500+.
Thanks! |
|
2011-09-23 2:43 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Member 75 | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question I think your head is in the right place. I'd go with the Cannondale Slice and spend the extra few bucks on a wheelset. Besides, now days those Cervelos are like a$$holes; everyones got one. Get a Slice! |
2011-09-23 3:02 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Champion 7595 Columbia, South Carolina | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question If they both fit, go with whichever one you think looks cooler. |
2011-09-23 3:10 PM in reply to: #3698116 |
Extreme Veteran 597 NE Ohio | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question sandall81 - 2011-09-23 3:43 PM Besides, now days those Cervelos are like a$$holes; everyones got one. yeah, this a$$hole has a P2 and i love it. must be that they make a good bike or something. |
2011-09-23 3:47 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question The P2 and slice are somewhat different geometries. Across all sizes, the Slice tends to be about 2cm shorter in reach. You can adjust for that with a shorter or longer stem...but just so you know that the bike geometries are not the same.
|
2011-09-23 3:56 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question |
|
2011-09-23 4:16 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Veteran 303 | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question Pretty happy with my slice. Smooth ride on regular road and chipseal. The bike comes with the behind the seat water bottle adapter for the cages. Geometry is different from other bikes, and I didn't match that specific geometry. We've been tweaking mine bit by bit (one initial fit, two follow up for minor changes) and I think it's just right. |
2011-09-23 4:17 PM in reply to: #3698294 |
Champion 10018 , Minnesota | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question Can you try them out? You might just like one better. If they are TRULY equal, I would probably buy the one that I could afford with the better components. You said they were different but didn't say how. That's just how I buy bikes. I also see value is just picking whichever looks cooler. You need to like your bike! |
2011-09-23 4:22 PM in reply to: #3698294 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question DanielG - 2011-09-23 3:56 PM Chrissie rides a Cannondale Slice. What else is there needed to know about it?
Didn't she also win her first IM on a P2 ? Chrissie would win with high handle bars, banana seat and a basket. It's not about the bike. Edited by marcag 2011-09-23 4:23 PM |
2011-09-23 4:26 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Elite 3498 Laguna Beach | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question I'm a little concerned about this because two of the bikes on this list have very differenct fit characteristics (consult Dan Empfield's Stack and Reach database to see the differences) and one is also fairly far away from the others. I don't see a common theme in these recommendations. Did your fitter tell you if you were a long, short or average torso configuration? These recommendations do suggest a trend, but I'd be interested in reading their take- it may clarify the range of choices. Was your fitter F.I.S.T. certified and experienced in running off the bike? |
2011-09-23 4:29 PM in reply to: #3698326 |
Champion 16151 Checkin' out the podium girls | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question marcag - 2011-09-23 5:22 PM DanielG - 2011-09-23 3:56 PM Chrissie rides a Cannondale Slice. What else is there needed to know about it?
Didn't she also win her first IM on a P2 ? Chrissie would win with high handle bars, banana seat and a basket. It's not about the bike. Or a big wheel. |
|
2011-09-23 4:35 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Elite 3060 N Carolina | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question The P2 is A LOT of bike for the money. If it fits, I don't see how you could go wrong. Full Disclosure: I ride a Kuota, so I'm not partial to any bikes on your list. |
2011-09-23 4:42 PM in reply to: #3698333 |
Master 2356 Westlake Village , Ca. | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question pitt83 - 2011-09-23 2:29 PM marcag - 2011-09-23 5:22 PM Or a big wheel.DanielG - 2011-09-23 3:56 PM Chrissie rides a Cannondale Slice. What else is there needed to know about it?
Didn't she also win her first IM on a P2 ? Chrissie would win with high handle bars, banana seat and a basket. It's not about the bike. I'm surprised she doesn't ride one. She is just about LAST on the list of pros I would look to for equipment choices. |
2011-09-23 4:55 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Member 56 Suwanee, GA | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question For those asking about my fit numbers, he did suggest specific configurations for each bike to fit my coordinates and numbers.
The following information covers the measurements from your TT/Triathlon bike fit. 50.5cm Virtual Horizontal Top Tube Cobb V-Flow - Saddle Used During Fit Look Keo - Pedals 172.5 Crank Arm Length 72cm Saddle Height 100mm Stem Length 42cm Base Bar Width (center -to- center) 270mm VisionTech Aero Extensions 76 Degree Seat Angle 48cm Saddle Tip -to- Handlebar 4cm Saddle -down to- Arm Pad Drop X/Y Measures maping out the touch points Handlebar X- 46.0 Y- 62.7 Head Tube X- 37.0 Y- 59.0 Saddle Rail Clamp X- 16.4 Y- 67.0
|
2011-09-23 5:06 PM in reply to: #3698382 |
Elite 3498 Laguna Beach | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question Excellent- I'm taking a look at this now...
|
2011-09-23 5:14 PM in reply to: #3698382 |
Elite 3498 Laguna Beach | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question Ehhh. Stop. There is mention of a 76 degree seat tube angle. Is this the "effective" seat tube angle, i.e., the angle between the center of your saddle and the center of the bottom bracket -or- is it the frame seat tube angle being prescribed? I sense it is the later, and not the former- as the former would be extremely relaxed. I sit at 76.5 on my road bike and you and I share the identical saddle height at 72cm but use 175mm cranks. Also- given these numbers: Do you have an extremely long femur? If not, I think this answers my question about whether or not this guy is F.I.S.T. certified, triathlon specific bike fitter... |
|
2011-09-23 5:26 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Member 56 Suwanee, GA | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question Note sure on the seat tube, but yes to Triathlon guys and yes to F.I.S.T. Not sure on my femur. I have to admit a lot of it is new to me and I am moving from road to TT/Tri to may be related to my flexibility and comfort. Here are my road measurements:
172.5mm Crank Length 72cm Saddle Height (follow 73 degree seat tube line up to top surface of saddle) 51cm Saddle Tip -to- Handlebar 100mm Current Stem Length (eventually extend up to 120mm) X/Y Measures (2D measurements used to map out touch points for bike fit professionals) Handlebar: X- 46.0 Y- 62.5 Headtube: X- 39.0 Y- 56.0 Sadddle Rail Clamp Section: X- 22.8 Y- 65.0
|
2011-09-23 5:28 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Expert 1183 Fort Wayne, IN | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question I got a Cannondale Slice as my first tri bike and it's been great. I think having a good frame and being able to upgrade components is a plus. |
2011-09-23 5:28 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Expert 1183 Fort Wayne, IN | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question I got a Cannondale Slice as my first tri bike and it's been great. I think having a good frame and being able to upgrade components is a plus. |
2011-09-23 5:42 PM in reply to: #3698424 |
Elite 3498 Laguna Beach | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question OK. some of this is starting to come into focus. You are measuring your saddle height at 72 cm. but, according to your description of how you are measuring it, you are measuring the saddle height by "...follow 73 degree seat tube line up to top surface of saddle." If you're willing to, do me a favor: Measure your saddle to verify it is 27 cm long. Measure from the rear of the saddle to the front. This will provide your saddle length. Most traditional racing saddles are within a couple millimeters of 27 cm. If you are using a saddle such as a Fizik Arione or a Profile Design Tri Stryke it will measure 30 cm. You indicated you aren't, so I post that for the general readership. Divide the length of your saddle in half. If it was 27 cm, that gives you 13.5 cm. Measure from the nose of your saddle to the 13.5 cm mark (if that is, in fact your centerline). Make a mark with the edge of tape or chalk. Now- measure the distance from the center of the bottom bracket, going upward, to the top center of the saddle. Do not measure along the seat tube of the frame. Measure only the linear distance to the saddle center in a straight line- which will trace your true effective seat tube angle to the center of the saddle. This measurement may be shorter than your original one by up to 8 mm. If you have Dura-Ace or Ultegra cranks it will be tough to find the center of your cranks- but try to be precise. |
2011-09-23 5:53 PM in reply to: #3698424 |
Elite 3498 Laguna Beach | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question oh, another note- your reach dimension is trending short given your saddle height. That makes sense. If your reach is short and your saddle height is the same as mine, or within a few millimeters, you may have a short torso and long femurs. If- and that is a fairly big "if" still... this supposition is accurate, it makes sense that you may sit shallower from a bike fit perspective. That may account for discussions surrounding a 76 degree seat angle. Here is the thing though- triathlon bike fit isn't done in a "vaccum". A big part of how a triathlete is fit and positoned correctly is not for cycling, but for running. You may have read about the Garside Study- the sometimes (unsuccessfully) disputed case for running more efficiently off a steep seat tube angle. Regardless of femur length, you can still sit steep, which is a more relaxed position, more "open" between torso and femur, less bent over and generally more comfortable. I latch onto this because a lot of fitters don't go steep enough with clients. Steeper is more relaxed, more open between torso and leg, easier to sit in and more comfortable. They make their positions too relaxed and cramped. When I hear seat tube angles around 80+ degrees I breath a sigh of relief. That is a nice, relaxed, open angle between femur and torso. When I hear anything south of 78 degrees effective seat tube angle on a tri bike I start to wonder....
|
|
2011-09-23 6:04 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Member 56 Suwanee, GA | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question Makes sense I need to go review my seat on my current road bike like asked. |
2011-09-23 9:50 PM in reply to: #3698326 |
Extreme Veteran 2261 Ridgeland, Mississippi | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question marcag - 2011-09-23 4:22 PM DanielG - 2011-09-23 3:56 PM Chrissie rides a Cannondale Slice. What else is there needed to know about it?
Didn't she also win her first IM on a P2 ? Chrissie would win with high handle bars, banana seat and a basket. It's not about the bike. Tell that to Crowie! |
2011-09-23 11:01 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Pro 3804 Seacoast, NH! | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question Go for one of the cheaper bikes and save for a power meter. DEFINITELY buy a power meter before wheels. Well, unless you don't like speed increases of course. Then just buy the wheels. |
2011-09-26 4:32 PM in reply to: #3698029 |
Member 56 Suwanee, GA | Subject: RE: Triathlon Bike Question Went to LBS and rode the Trek Speed Concept 7.2, a little more than I wanted to spend. The guy at the LBS liked that bike given my numbers and after watching me on the trainer. He also just liked the bike Nice bike and and ok feel. I definitely think price and fit the Cannondale Slice 4 is better. I had to order the Slice 4 and pay in full but the LBS will return 100% of my spend up to 3 weeks after riding if we cannot get a decent fit/feel. If I return we will work on the Trek or the cervelo P2C. Thanks for everyone's comments. I guess per everyone here it is all about feel, budget, and coolness |
|