Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed (Page 89)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2016-03-15 8:16 AM in reply to: JBacarella |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by JBacarella The question came up in another non-BT group I am in. What is the minimum amount of time you should take, if you want to do an HIM followed by an IM. I am doing a local HIM in September and then One month and one day later, I am doing IM Louisville. What does the group think? The opinions are all over the place in the other group. It's all over the place as people have done and been all over the place. I don't really like the idea of having one within a few months of the IM. It's taking away from the longer training that the athlete should be doing at the time. The HIM as a whole is a decent size day, but the durations are really not long enough to test out how things will go in an IM. It's just that much longer and age group athletes generally just don't have the volume day in, day out like a pro would. It's sitting right at a time when your biggest days would be coming. Both the event itself, any tapering for it and recovery after. That's for really racing them, however. If you're more just getting through them then sure, that should be enough. Something that seems to help recover faster for this would be taking it easy on the run. |
|
2016-03-15 8:45 AM in reply to: brigby1 |
Master 4119 Toronto | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by JBacarella The question came up in another non-BT group I am in. What is the minimum amount of time you should take, if you want to do an HIM followed by an IM. I am doing a local HIM in September and then One month and one day later, I am doing IM Louisville. What does the group think? The opinions are all over the place in the other group. It's all over the place as people have done and been all over the place. I don't really like the idea of having one within a few months of the IM. It's taking away from the longer training that the athlete should be doing at the time. The HIM as a whole is a decent size day, but the durations are really not long enough to test out how things will go in an IM. It's just that much longer and age group athletes generally just don't have the volume day in, day out like a pro would. It's sitting right at a time when your biggest days would be coming. Both the event itself, any tapering for it and recovery after. That's for really racing them, however. If you're more just getting through them then sure, that should be enough. Something that seems to help recover faster for this would be taking it easy on the run. Definitely about how you would approach them. I did a half as a training/tune-up during my IM training. I was training specifically for IM and used a HIM as a stop along the way - it was at the beginning of July and my IM was mid-august - so about a month and a half. I didn't really taper for the half and took training the week after pretty easy. I didn't 'race' but i didn't sit and take it easy either ... I really wanted some races in the lead up to get me ready. Particularly because I was a nervous swimmer and i needed the practice at races with the mass start. I was actually pleasantly surprised at how well i recovered and was able to get back to it. It is very common for people to do a HIM as a training race to check pacing/nutrition, etc - and four weeks is what i see recommended pretty often. |
2016-03-15 8:48 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
1731 Denver, Colorado | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by jmkizer Happy birthday Melanie! Yes!!! Happy birthday to Melanie!!! (and my brother too ) |
2016-03-15 8:52 AM in reply to: JBacarella |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by JBacarella The question came up in another non-BT group I am in. What is the minimum amount of time you should take, if you want to do an HIM followed by an IM. I am doing a local HIM in September and then One month and one day later, I am doing IM Louisville. What does the group think? The opinions are all over the place in the other group. I prefer for a training HIM to be a little farther out, 8-9 weeks from the IM, but a lot of people do one 3 or 4 weeks before the big day and are fine. For me, I treat the HIM as a training day (to run through race logistics and nutrition) so I look at my training plan and figure out what is a good week to put an HIM in relation to the volume in the plan. In most IM plans, your volume 4 weeks out is going to be pretty large, and for me a 70.3 is not enough volume for the bike or run I need - I would have to tack on other workouts to compensate and that's a pain to me. Just my .002! |
2016-03-15 9:04 AM in reply to: brigby1 |
Extreme Veteran 2263 Ridgeland, Mississippi | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by JBacarella The question came up in another non-BT group I am in. What is the minimum amount of time you should take, if you want to do an HIM followed by an IM. I am doing a local HIM in September and then One month and one day later, I am doing IM Louisville. What does the group think? The opinions are all over the place in the other group. It's all over the place as people have done and been all over the place. I don't really like the idea of having one within a few months of the IM. It's taking away from the longer training that the athlete should be doing at the time. The HIM as a whole is a decent size day, but the durations are really not long enough to test out how things will go in an IM. It's just that much longer and age group athletes generally just don't have the volume day in, day out like a pro would. It's sitting right at a time when your biggest days would be coming. Both the event itself, any tapering for it and recovery after. That's for really racing them, however. If you're more just getting through them then sure, that should be enough. Something that seems to help recover faster for this would be taking it easy on the run. I agree with all that Ben says here. |
2016-03-15 12:16 PM in reply to: juniperjen |
Master 4119 Toronto | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by juniperjen Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by JBacarella The question came up in another non-BT group I am in. What is the minimum amount of time you should take, if you want to do an HIM followed by an IM. I am doing a local HIM in September and then One month and one day later, I am doing IM Louisville. What does the group think? The opinions are all over the place in the other group. It's all over the place as people have done and been all over the place. I don't really like the idea of having one within a few months of the IM. It's taking away from the longer training that the athlete should be doing at the time. The HIM as a whole is a decent size day, but the durations are really not long enough to test out how things will go in an IM. It's just that much longer and age group athletes generally just don't have the volume day in, day out like a pro would. It's sitting right at a time when your biggest days would be coming. Both the event itself, any tapering for it and recovery after. That's for really racing them, however. If you're more just getting through them then sure, that should be enough. Something that seems to help recover faster for this would be taking it easy on the run. Definitely about how you would approach them. I did a half as a training/tune-up during my IM training. I was training specifically for IM and used a HIM as a stop along the way - it was at the beginning of July and my IM was mid-august - so about a month and a half. I didn't really taper for the half and took training the week after pretty easy. I didn't 'race' but i didn't sit and take it easy either ... I really wanted some races in the lead up to get me ready. Particularly because I was a nervous swimmer and i needed the practice at races with the mass start. I was actually pleasantly surprised at how well i recovered and was able to get back to it. It is very common for people to do a HIM as a training race to check pacing/nutrition, etc - and four weeks is what i see recommended pretty often. Oh and having some races to do during IM training was fun! It's all very serious, i know, but it was great to remember why I love the sport. |
|
2016-03-15 12:43 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Stacey - Congratulations to K! Are you two still on track for Dopey 2018? |
2016-03-15 1:06 PM in reply to: juniperjen |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by juniperjen Originally posted by juniperjen Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by JBacarella The question came up in another non-BT group I am in. What is the minimum amount of time you should take, if you want to do an HIM followed by an IM. I am doing a local HIM in September and then One month and one day later, I am doing IM Louisville. What does the group think? The opinions are all over the place in the other group. It's all over the place as people have done and been all over the place. I don't really like the idea of having one within a few months of the IM. It's taking away from the longer training that the athlete should be doing at the time. The HIM as a whole is a decent size day, but the durations are really not long enough to test out how things will go in an IM. It's just that much longer and age group athletes generally just don't have the volume day in, day out like a pro would. It's sitting right at a time when your biggest days would be coming. Both the event itself, any tapering for it and recovery after. That's for really racing them, however. If you're more just getting through them then sure, that should be enough. Something that seems to help recover faster for this would be taking it easy on the run. Definitely about how you would approach them. I did a half as a training/tune-up during my IM training. I was training specifically for IM and used a HIM as a stop along the way - it was at the beginning of July and my IM was mid-august - so about a month and a half. I didn't really taper for the half and took training the week after pretty easy. I didn't 'race' but i didn't sit and take it easy either ... I really wanted some races in the lead up to get me ready. Particularly because I was a nervous swimmer and i needed the practice at races with the mass start. I was actually pleasantly surprised at how well i recovered and was able to get back to it. It is very common for people to do a HIM as a training race to check pacing/nutrition, etc - and four weeks is what i see recommended pretty often. Oh and having some races to do during IM training was fun! It's all very serious, i know, but it was great to remember why I love the sport. Oh yeah, context can matter. Sometimes a lot. The description of doing "fine" can come up after doing a lot of things and not take in the situation may be different. I think a lot of people could still put in a decent effort at the time gaps listed, even with Justin's. However, if he was trying to do something like KQ at the IM, then this sounds more like a bad idea. One way or the other isn't bad in itself, but the crossing of goals and perspectives is. It's also not as good for someone optimizing such a race to be very insistent to someone who is more of a completer. Just last year I did the two longest rides ever on consecutive weekends. Certainly not ones I was really trying to go after. |
2016-03-15 2:39 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Tomorrow's forecast is calling for an average wind speed of 35 mph. Average. This could be fun. I might be able to coast all the way to the lake, then need a ride to get back. |
2016-03-15 3:18 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by brigby1 Tomorrow's forecast is calling for an average wind speed of 35 mph. Average. This could be fun. I might be able to coast all the way to the lake, then need a ride to get back. Haha I was going to say, sounds like a good day for a one way trip On Saturday I was doing a tempo run but because of a tree down on the northbound section I was forced to run southbound for all of the run, straight into a steady wind. However, we had a major wind storm here on Sunday and I had the most glorious tailwind. I swear when my feet left the ground I was blown and additional half step, and it takes a lot to really notice a tailwind when running. |
2016-03-15 3:19 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Master 6595 Rio Rancho, NM | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by brigby1 Tomorrow's forecast is calling for an average wind speed of 35 mph. Average. This could be fun. I might be able to coast all the way to the lake, then need a ride to get back. We get pretty windy in the spring, often with blowing sand. When it gets too bad I take my run inside. |
|
2016-03-15 3:30 PM in reply to: 0 |
Expert 2811 | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by juniperjen Originally posted by juniperjen Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by JBacarella The question came up in another non-BT group I am in. What is the minimum amount of time you should take, if you want to do an HIM followed by an IM. I am doing a local HIM in September and then One month and one day later, I am doing IM Louisville. What does the group think? The opinions are all over the place in the other group. It's all over the place as people have done and been all over the place. I don't really like the idea of having one within a few months of the IM. It's taking away from the longer training that the athlete should be doing at the time. The HIM as a whole is a decent size day, but the durations are really not long enough to test out how things will go in an IM. It's just that much longer and age group athletes generally just don't have the volume day in, day out like a pro would. It's sitting right at a time when your biggest days would be coming. Both the event itself, any tapering for it and recovery after. That's for really racing them, however. If you're more just getting through them then sure, that should be enough. Something that seems to help recover faster for this would be taking it easy on the run. Definitely about how you would approach them. I did a half as a training/tune-up during my IM training. I was training specifically for IM and used a HIM as a stop along the way - it was at the beginning of July and my IM was mid-august - so about a month and a half. I didn't really taper for the half and took training the week after pretty easy. I didn't 'race' but i didn't sit and take it easy either ... I really wanted some races in the lead up to get me ready. Particularly because I was a nervous swimmer and i needed the practice at races with the mass start.  I was actually pleasantly surprised at how well i recovered and was able to get back to it. It is very common for people to do a HIM as a training race to check pacing/nutrition, etc - and four weeks is what i see recommended pretty often. Oh and having some races to do during IM training was fun!  It's all very serious, i know, but it was great to remember why I love the sport. Thanks for the input. I'm finding that opinions are widespread on the subject. Kind of like everything else in Triathlon. This year will be the fifth time have have done this HIM. I'm overly tied to the race. It is in my home town and I act as the liaison between the company that owns the race, the city and local businesses. It's a fun race for me, because I ride parts or all of the bike course through the Summer, I do a lot of my swimming on the swim course, plus I know almost all of the volunteers and since it is local, I have a lot of support throughout the race. Plus I get some notoriety, because I am literally the only person who lives in this county to have done the HIM, it turns into a little ego boost for me haha. I have never really tapered for this race. I just take it easy and slower the week before, and rest on Friday (so it's kind of a taper). I have it planned on a recovery week also. I have no fantasy about a podium for either, (although I age group up this year and hopefully clear away some of the mid-lfe crisis crowd). I just like to do it for me and hopefully beat the last year. As for the Ironman, my goal is a time less that 16:59:59. I turn 50 next month and relish the fact that I am in better condition than most people in their 20's. The IM has been a long time goal and now it is a little FU to age. My wife and I always tell our kids that age does not matter as long as you are happy and doing the things you enjoy. The people who fret about age, do that because they are not happy with themselves and what they are doing with their lives. Besides 50 is the new 30 haha. Happy Birthday Melanie. Edited by JBacarella 2016-03-15 5:08 PM |
2016-03-15 4:21 PM in reply to: JBacarella |
Veteran 659 East Texas | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed HAPPY BIRTHDAY MELANIE!! Well I got to do my first open water swim of the year yesterday. The water was chilly but it was very refreshing. |
2016-03-15 4:35 PM in reply to: JJ- |
436 | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Anyone in the group ride on Zwift? Since buying my steed I've ridden 550 miles on Zwift, 0 outdoors... |
2016-03-15 6:18 PM in reply to: JJ- |
Veteran 1900 Southampton, Ontario | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by JJ- Well I got to do my first open water swim of the year yesterday. The water was chilly but it was very refreshing. Ah, I love you Texans! March 15th is the official date when the ice fishing huts have to be off the ice up here. Its been pretty mild and the ice is getting thin but it will be a while still before I can get an open water swim in. That said I had a good family day at the ski hill on Saturday and a decent ride in on Sunday so I do like the 4 different seasons. Spring is coming. |
2016-03-15 6:20 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Veteran 1900 Southampton, Ontario | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by brigby1 Tomorrow's forecast is calling for an average wind speed of 35 mph. Average. This could be fun. I might be able to coast all the way to the lake, then need a ride to get back. Its inexplicable but somehow I dont think I have ever had a ride with the wind at my back - its always straight in my face. I guess I just lucky that way! |
|
2016-03-15 7:53 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by Asalzwed Originally posted by brigby1 Tomorrow's forecast is calling for an average wind speed of 35 mph. Average. This could be fun. I might be able to coast all the way to the lake, then need a ride to get back. Haha I was going to say, sounds like a good day for a one way trip On Saturday I was doing a tempo run but because of a tree down on the northbound section I was forced to run southbound for all of the run, straight into a steady wind. However, we had a major wind storm here on Sunday and I had the most glorious tailwind. I swear when my feet left the ground I was blown and additional half step, and it takes a lot to really notice a tailwind when running. Think my sister lives within a couple miles of the end point ... Oh those runs are fun! Have had some with the last mile in a race even. Although one tempo with that was interesting as it would wrap around a largish building. I'd go from low 6's to a near stop within two steps! |
2016-03-15 7:54 PM in reply to: DaveL |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by DaveL Originally posted by brigby1 Its inexplicable but somehow I dont think I have ever had a ride with the wind at my back - its always straight in my face. I guess I just lucky that way! Tomorrow's forecast is calling for an average wind speed of 35 mph. Average. This could be fun. I might be able to coast all the way to the lake, then need a ride to get back. Strong wind is a minimum 85% of the ride fighting it somehow or other. Expect 90-some. |
2016-03-15 8:06 PM in reply to: 0 |
Master 6595 Rio Rancho, NM | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed |
2016-03-16 6:23 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
Master 8249 Eugene, Oregon | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Don't think I know enough about power meters or biking with power in general to make much of a judgement on the Power2Max. Mainly got it because it was relatively affordable, I had a discount code for it through my coach's club, plus they had a really good Black Friday special that bundled it with the Garmin 520, which I also needed as the very basic computer I had didn't have the capability to connect with a power meter. It's easy to install (you can get it partially assembled), pretty usable; you can set how often you want it to check power; it gives you the power for both legs so you can see the balance. It has been harder to learn to use it than I thought, though. Sometimes power seems to go up or down and I'm not sure why. At first I thought power was only a matter of gear and cadence, but there seems to be more at play than that--it seems you can push more or less forcefully on pedals in the same gear and cadence and get a different power number?? Sometimes I can't tell I'm doing anything different, and the power goes up or down by 10 or even 20 watts--indoors! I suspect that cadence or force has changed and I'm just not paying attention. I do a lot of my training very early AM, and often watch videos with music, so sometimes my cadence changes a bit with the music tempo or what the riders on the screen are doing, or I just zone out. The fact that my HR also drifts up and down then suggests I'm not keeping a constant level of effort. Usually only happens during warmup, cooldown, and Z2 type steady rides. I'm much better at staying focused and "in the zone" for harder stuff (Z3 and above). I am kind of like this in other things (much more focused under pressure) too! I try to train myself by looking at the video for a certain number of pedal strokes and then checking the PM to see if I am still "in the zone". Outdoors it is more difficult to use the PM as I obviously can't have my eye on it all the time (can't they invent one that talks??) and the area where I ride outdoors is often very windy. I'm still trying to learn how to hold power steadier in those conditions. I know to change gears, but I think I'm not keeping a constant pressure on the pedals and instinctively am trying to keep speed steady rather than power. The more I ride with the meter, the more I realize I'm a very inexperienced rider--I really don't know much about how to generate speed, what I can sustain for different times/distances, what gear/cadence mechanics are most efficient for me, etc. I've had a lifetime to figure out that kind of stuff with running and, to a lesser extent, swimming. But cycling is another ball game entirely! |
2016-03-16 8:21 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed I don't have experience with a P2Max, but others who know something about power do and like it. I think the accuracy is a little less than something like Quarq or SRM, but still reasonably good. So yeah, tends to be a decent value. I don't think the unit is a reason to suspect the power numbers you've posted. Power can be a little funny trying to get your head around. It's often defined as a work rate. Work is applying a force over a distance. Moving a 2 ton pile of bricks 100 ft ends up being the same amount of work whether it's done 1 brick at a time, 10, or the whole pile at once. For power to be the same, then each would have to finish in the same amount of time. The whole pile at once movement will operate under a very high force, but be moving more slowly. The one brick at a time will have lower force, but be moving really fast. They feel quite different, so it can take some time to get used to develop the feel for energy usage rate as opposed to force, which I think people tend to do. The 10-20 watt jumping is fairly normal. It's not going to be a perfectly flat line. Are you using any smoothing or average features? I leave it on the 1 second or instant, but I'm very much an exception with that. Many people will use instead a 3, 5 or 10 second average to help smooth out the jumpiness. Much easier on them mentally as the numbers aren't going all over the place. |
|
2016-03-16 9:06 AM in reply to: brigby1 |
1731 Denver, Colorado | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Happy Wednesday Question on the wet suit: my co-worker's husband, who used to do triathlons and completed several IM races, is not doing the sport anymore and wants to get rid of his wet suite. For free. Obviously, I will have to try it to see if it fits me, but just wanted to get some general opinion from you guys. I am 5'9 and he is 5'8. He's male, I'm female. Should I be optimistic? Would it fit? What's the general rule: you buy a bit bigger, just the right size? That would be great if I had a wet suite for free |
2016-03-16 9:19 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Veteran 1900 Southampton, Ontario | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Ug, I typed out a 3 paragraph reply then lost it. A power meter is a great measuring tool to measure your progress as it removes a lot of variables and gives a reliable repeatable number. Heart rate is impacted by a lot of variables - fatigue, caffeine, even listening to music. Speed as a measurement is impacted by wind, road conditions, tires, aero clothing etc. I dont have a power meter but am interested. I see 2 uses - 1 in training so I can actually measure rides - ie I climbed this hill at 200W last time and now can do it at 210W - Yay! The second would be in racing- I know I can maintain 180W for an hour so if I go out and try to "kill it" at 220W I will likely crash and burn. |
2016-03-16 9:28 AM in reply to: marysia83 |
Master 6595 Rio Rancho, NM | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by marysia83 Happy Wednesday Question on the wet suit: my co-worker's husband, who used to do triathlons and completed several IM races, is not doing the sport anymore and wants to get rid of his wet suite. For free. Obviously, I will have to try it to see if it fits me, but just wanted to get some general opinion from you guys. I am 5'9 and he is 5'8. He's male, I'm female. Should I be optimistic? Would it fit? What's the general rule: you buy a bit bigger, just the right size? That would be great if I had a wet suite for free If you are approximately the same size it should fit. Both of my wetsuits are designed for men. They fit me because I'm, um, aero up top Try it on. If it fits then you've got a new suit! It should be difficult to get in to and feel snug. If it fits loose then it won't do the job. |
2016-03-16 9:29 AM in reply to: marysia83 |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Manatee Mentors 2016 - Closed Originally posted by marysia83 Happy Wednesday Question on the wet suit: my co-worker's husband, who used to do triathlons and completed several IM races, is not doing the sport anymore and wants to get rid of his wet suite. For free. Obviously, I will have to try it to see if it fits me, but just wanted to get some general opinion from you guys. I am 5'9 and he is 5'8. He's male, I'm female. Should I be optimistic? Would it fit? What's the general rule: you buy a bit bigger, just the right size? That would be great if I had a wet suite for free Since it's free, take a look at it. Sometimes they do work. But when doing so try to ignore that it's free. Make sure that it actually works well for you though as a poor fitting one can make things go terribly. |
|
| |||
|