Other Resources My Cup of Joe » No more Wrestling in the Olympics Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2013-02-13 9:48 AM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
I don't understand. Of all sports, this and the marathon should be sacrosanct. Wakeboarding? Seriously?


2013-02-13 10:00 AM
in reply to: #4620534

User image

Pro
4838
2000200050010010010025
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

BrianRunsPhilly - 2013-02-13 9:48 AM I don't understand. Of all sports, this and the marathon should be sacrosanct. Wakeboarding? Seriously?

Ping pong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2013-02-13 10:13 AM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Elite
2733
200050010010025
Venture Industries,
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

As a former wrestler, as a kid you dreamed about going to the olympics.  The olympics was the pinnacle of the sport.

Sad.  I'm really bummed about it.

2013-02-13 10:21 AM
in reply to: #4619691

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
blbriley - 2013-02-12 5:30 PM

The IOC should use my criteria: if someone needs to tell you that you won it's not a sport, it's a pageant.

 

boxing (not all matches are decided by KO but by a ref)

 

2013-02-13 10:49 AM
in reply to: #4619504

User image

Champion
16743
500050005000100050010010025
Somewhere I can be nekidd
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
jmk-brooklyn - 2013-02-12 3:46 PM
ironannekidd - 2013-02-12 2:37 PM

I made the comment during the summer Olympics that Rhythmic Gymnastics is an Olympic sport but Women's softball is not - what a bunch of bull. Not to mention ping pong, and badminton.

I'm not sure I understand the inclusion of professional basketball and tennis players in the Olympics either, I thought it was supposed to be for amateurs.

Women's softball was taken out, depending on whose story you believe, because: A) It's not played on a wide enough global scale to be competitive in enough places. IOW, the US and one or two other countries completely dominated the rest of the teams in the field to the extent that the medal contenders were a forgone conclusion before the tournament began. Or, B) The use of PED's among professional baseball players was so rampant that most of the top MLB players would refuse to play in the Olympics because they could never hope to pass the stringent IOC drug testing. Rather than have a competition from which nearly all of the top athletes in the world in the sport were absent, the IOC decided to drop baseball and with it softball, which was viewed as the female version of baseball.

Can't the same be said for basketball? Haven't the American men won the past 5 Olympics and the women something like 7?

 With the World Baseball Classic taking place now I doubt baseball would make it back into the Olympics.



Edited by ironannekidd 2013-02-13 10:50 AM
2013-02-13 10:59 AM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

Theoretically, it's sad to see wrestling go since it's one of the oldest sports in the olympics...

But will I actually miss it?  No.  I don't think I watched one single minute of live or delayed wrestling on TV in the past 4 Olympics.  However, I have tuned in to watch syncronized diving, syncronized swimming, ping pong, badminton, and some of those other goofy sports.  So go figure.



2013-02-13 11:23 AM
in reply to: #4619487

User image

Champion
7136
5000200010025
Knoxville area
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
ironannekidd - 2013-02-12 3:37 PM

I'm not sure I understand the inclusion of professional basketball and tennis players in the Olympics either, I thought it was supposed to be for amateurs.

I think the vast majority of olympic events are dominated by professionals.

Even in Triathlon the top...well basically everyone was a professional.

 

Insanity that wrestling isn't included...

2013-02-13 11:26 AM
in reply to: #4620592

User image

Elite
3770
200010005001001002525
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
Brock Samson - 2013-02-13 10:13 AM

As a former wrestler, as a kid you dreamed about going to the olympics.  The olympics was the pinnacle of the sport.

Sad.  I'm really bummed about it.

this is what I feel should be a main criteria...and really, should be amateurs.  Possibly athletes that if they win they get purses, sure, since they have to support themselves. 

I've always used the argument that Pentathlon is in it b/c its one of the originals.  Now that they are taking those out, sheesh. 

2013-02-13 11:38 AM
in reply to: #4620740

User image

Champion
16743
500050005000100050010010025
Somewhere I can be nekidd
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
Leegoocrap - 2013-02-13 12:23 PM
ironannekidd - 2013-02-12 3:37 PM

I'm not sure I understand the inclusion of professional basketball and tennis players in the Olympics either, I thought it was supposed to be for amateurs.

I think the vast majority of olympic events are dominated by professionals.

Even in Triathlon the top...well basically everyone was a professional.

 

Insanity that wrestling isn't included...

I always thought that you had to be an amateur to compete in the Olympics. There was the big deal this year about one of the swimmers - Lochte or Phelps appearing in some photos and the questions involving the timing and their eligibility to participate. I remember when I was younger that figure skaters had to be amateurs, maybe they still do. What changed that allowed professional teams in?

 

2013-02-13 11:43 AM
in reply to: #4620769

User image

Champion
7136
5000200010025
Knoxville area
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
ironannekidd - 2013-02-13 12:38 PM
Leegoocrap - 2013-02-13 12:23 PM
ironannekidd - 2013-02-12 3:37 PM

I'm not sure I understand the inclusion of professional basketball and tennis players in the Olympics either, I thought it was supposed to be for amateurs.

I think the vast majority of olympic events are dominated by professionals.

Even in Triathlon the top...well basically everyone was a professional.

 

Insanity that wrestling isn't included...

I always thought that you had to be an amateur to compete in the Olympics. There was the big deal this year about one of the swimmers - Lochte or Phelps appearing in some photos and the questions involving the timing and their eligibility to participate. I remember when I was younger that figure skaters had to be amateurs, maybe they still do. What changed that allowed professional teams in?

 

I am not sure... it's possibly just the way you phrased it, but pro teams aren't allowed in. Like in the cycling road race, it wasn't like SKY could just show up (although it turned out Wiggo & Cav were both Brits on Sky) and race, but definitely everyone (that I'm aware of) in the race was a professional cyclist.
2013-02-13 11:47 AM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Master
1433
100010010010010025
Calgary, AB
Silver member
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

Wrestling out, but golf is in? Really? And I will never understand what horse dancing has to do with the olympics either. 

Badminton is an excellent sport, but agree the system seemed corrupt/rigged.

 

 

 



2013-02-13 2:41 PM
in reply to: #4620677

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
ironannekidd - 2013-02-13 10:49 AM

jmk-brooklyn - 2013-02-12 3:46 PM
ironannekidd - 2013-02-12 2:37 PM

I made the comment during the summer Olympics that Rhythmic Gymnastics is an Olympic sport but Women's softball is not - what a bunch of bull. Not to mention ping pong, and badminton.

I'm not sure I understand the inclusion of professional basketball and tennis players in the Olympics either, I thought it was supposed to be for amateurs.

Women's softball was taken out, depending on whose story you believe, because: A) It's not played on a wide enough global scale to be competitive in enough places. IOW, the US and one or two other countries completely dominated the rest of the teams in the field to the extent that the medal contenders were a forgone conclusion before the tournament began. Or, B) The use of PED's among professional baseball players was so rampant that most of the top MLB players would refuse to play in the Olympics because they could never hope to pass the stringent IOC drug testing. Rather than have a competition from which nearly all of the top athletes in the world in the sport were absent, the IOC decided to drop baseball and with it softball, which was viewed as the female version of baseball.

Can't the same be said for basketball? Haven't the American men won the past 5 Olympics and the women something like 7?

 With the World Baseball Classic taking place now I doubt baseball would make it back into the Olympics.



Argentina won the men's gold in '04 with USA taking Bronze, but I get your point. I think the USA has won 7 out of the last 10 and one of the losses was the infamous 1972 gold medal match against the USSR.

The difference is that basketball is played widely, professionally, all over the world, while softball is only played in a few countries. It has less to do with the same countries winning year after year and more to do with the sport's global popularity. Gymnastics always comes down to the same handful of countries every year (china, USA, Russia, etc.) but gymnastics is a popular sport all over the world.
2013-02-13 3:08 PM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

Best article about why it was dropped. 

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-12/sports/ct-spt-0213-olympic-wrestling--20130213_1_full-ioc-membership-ioc-executive-board-international-olympic-committee-decision

Basically FILA (Wrestling's global federation) was not actively lobbying.  From the article:

The problem is the places where wrestling is most popular — Iran, Russia and several other republics of the former Soviet Union — have no clout on the IOC executive board. Neither does the country with the most Olympic wrestling medals, the United States.

None of the executive board's 15 members is from those countries. Eight are from Western Europe. Several have blatant conflicts of interest because they are past or present top officials of the international federations that govern sports under consideration Tuesday, most notably Juan Antonio Samaranch Jr. of Spain.

2013-02-13 6:29 PM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Veteran
671
5001002525
Harrison, Oh
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

Good article from USA Wrestling:

http://www.themat.com/section.php?section_id=3&page=showarticle&ArticleID=26046

 

Wrestling is the #4 top medal earner for the United States; they are prepared to fight hard to keep it.  They have set up a Facebook page "Keep Wrestling in the Olympics" and updates can also be found on themat.com.

2013-02-14 4:33 AM
in reply to: #4619381

User image

Expert
1662
10005001002525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

Kido - 2013-02-12 11:53 AM Maybe ravishing rick flare, the junkyard dog, and the undertaker was not the image the US wanted to put out there?

Let's call it for what it really is.  This is a panty waist genetation with a generation of panty waists'.  Gymnastics, swimming, and diving sell air time.  A brutal, tough, sweaty, competative sport like wrestling is only watched by those who care.  If the WWII generation was the "greatest generation", this generation of skinny jeans wearing kids would be the antithesis of that, thus the decision to remove wrestling.

Marginalizing the sport with "pro wrestling" refferences is exactly what I'm reffering to in the above^^ 



Edited by kevinbe 2013-02-14 4:35 AM
2013-02-14 4:39 AM
in reply to: #4619428

User image

Expert
1662
10005001002525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
GomesBolt - 2013-02-12 12:13 PM

Kido - 2013-02-12 1:53 PM Maybe ravishing rick flare, the junkyard dog, and the undertaker was not the image the US wanted to put out there?

Well the US wanted it.  Afterall, we have the most medals in Wrestling.  It's probably the French who didn't want to keep losing to us.  Women's wrestling was in this last olympics.  I think it's a case of not modifying the settings to make it more popular. 

UFC isn't better than boxing.  It's just that the UFC guys do a better job of making it cool.  Wrestling is pretty geeky.  But if you hype it up a bit, maybe you get some people to watch it.

????  You obviously have never wrestled and have limited understanding of what your talking about?


2013-02-14 5:24 AM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
Easy there Kevin. I wrestled Division I in college and played judo, sombo, boxing, and Mixed Martial Arts in the Marine Corps. I wrestled Freestyle and Greco in the offseason and my neck is still jacked up.

I know plenty of what I'm talking about.
2013-02-14 6:02 AM
in reply to: #4621702

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
kevinbe - 2013-02-14 4:33 AM

Kido - 2013-02-12 11:53 AM Maybe ravishing rick flare, the junkyard dog, and the undertaker was not the image the US wanted to put out there?

Let's call it for what it really is.  This is a panty waist genetation with a generation of panty waists'.  Gymnastics, swimming, and diving sell air time.  A brutal, tough, sweaty, competative sport like wrestling is only watched by those who care.  If the WWII generation was the "greatest generation", this generation of skinny jeans wearing kids would be the antithesis of that, thus the decision to remove wrestling.

Marginalizing the sport with "pro wrestling" refferences is exactly what I'm reffering to in the above^^ 

On this comment, I have to call you as well. If you spent some time around this generation in tough circumstances like say a war you'd have a higher opinion. They are smarter than any generation before them and they need leadership, not put downs. I've seen this generation on two deployments to Iraq and daily in garrison. They're sharp, they're smart, they look things up if you tell them something to check the accuracy or call you on the inaccuracy of the comment. They do need leadership and calling them "panty waists (did you mean "waste")" is not leadership.

Besides, maybe you missed every one of the linked articles, but the decision to eliminate wrestling came not from this generation, it came from the old white jackazzes from Western Europe. Many of them members of "the greatest generation."

Wrestling got eliminated because they failed to go on the offensive and they got overconfident. That's usually a recipe to get beat both on the mat and in the real world.

Edited by GomesBolt 2013-02-14 6:04 AM

2013-02-14 10:25 AM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Champion
5312
5000100100100
Calgary
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

maybe it is time to have 2 Olympic games.  One that appeals to the masses and one that doesn't.

I am reading Quiet right now, great book.  It seems clear to me that the olympics are run by a bunch of extroverts for a bunch of extroverts.  Big show etc.  They had a thing here, it is the 25th anniversary of the Olympics in Calgary.  They put it on for 50 million dollars.  The Olympics in Sochi..... 50 billion.  I don't get it.  First of all, no one cares about these sports.  Any of these sports.  Figure skating, pentathlon, heptathlon, show jumping.  Athletics in general.  Judo.  When I say no one, I mean in the sense that I can say no one cares about triathlon.  What is the point of showcasing sports no one cares about except every 4 years.  Why make it a big show.  It isn't a big show the other three years, except for the people who care and can't find it on TV.  And for that matter, why isn't NFL style football in the Olympics, or NASCAR.  I mean those would be big draws right.  Ha, could you imagine a US dream team in football.  HA.   So why not make it a small show.  This is stupid.  It is about money and getting the media to hook the public so that the media is willing to pay zillions for the rights to cover it.

I don't like watching football or soccer or hockey.  Not that those sports don't require skill.  It is the pomp and circumstance of it all.  And I like Phelps and he is a beast and I would love to watch him but I hardly can stomach that coverage.  Someone said in this thread if someone has to tell you who won it is not a sport it is a pageant.  Well I would say there is a related point, that being the more the fans and the media make it a pageant then less important the sport is. 

You know what would make a good Olympics, worth watching, is if the people who competed had to hold down a 40 hour a week job.

Freaks of nature them all.

--------------------

this post has been an advertizement for the ignore button.

2013-02-14 9:50 PM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Veteran
348
10010010025
Houston, TX
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
Definitely a dumb move. I'm not a wrestler or even a fan, but it's a classic Olympic sport.Get rid of: Rythmic gymnastics, synchronized swimming, synchronized diving, trampoline, soccer, badminton, BMX, and table tennis. Soccer, largely because the world cup is the real event. No one cares about soccer at the olympics. Same thing with tennis. 

Drop the planned addition of golf (see soccer, tennis) and rugby (too local) I don't think baseball/softball should be back either. Nix all other new sports: karate, wushu (kungfu), rollersports, wakeboarding, squash and sports (rock) climbing. The Chinese are trying to fill the Olympics with sports they are good at to win the medal counts.

Change swimming to one race for each distance. Take out all the different styles, you shouldn't be able to win multiple medals at one distance because there are five different strokes. The breaststroke is a resting stroke. I never saw the point of trying to see who can do a resting stroke the fastest. That's like saying with the 100M final there could be Hopping, Backwards, Normal, Sideways, and Tied Hands.
2013-02-14 10:43 PM
in reply to: #4621720

User image

Expert
1662
10005001002525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

GomesBolt - 2013-02-14 3:24 AM Easy there Kevin. I wrestled Division I in college and played judo, sombo, boxing, and Mixed Martial Arts in the Marine Corps. I wrestled Freestyle and Greco in the offseason and my neck is still jacked up.

I know plenty of what I'm talking about.

Yeah, I did come off on a little rant in this thread.  Just a little dissapointed that they're dropping a sports highest stage away from those who spend the majority of their life to compete at it at the highest level.  It's not like wrestling is irrelevent to those who compete at it, and there are plenty of nations that have high level programs, same as gymnastics, and swimming.  Like those sports, the athletes who wrestle also train there a.. off to make and compete at the olympics. 



2013-02-15 6:29 AM
in reply to: #4623147

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
chris00nj - 2013-02-14 9:50 PM

Definitely a dumb move. I'm not a wrestler or even a fan, but it's a classic Olympic sport.Get rid of: Rythmic gymnastics, synchronized swimming, synchronized diving, trampoline, soccer, badminton, BMX, and table tennis. Soccer, largely because the world cup is the real event. No one cares about soccer at the olympics. Same thing with tennis. 

Drop the planned addition of golf (see soccer, tennis) and rugby (too local) I don't think baseball/softball should be back either. Nix all other new sports: karate, wushu (kungfu), rollersports, wakeboarding, squash and sports (rock) climbing. The Chinese are trying to fill the Olympics with sports they are good at to win the medal counts.

Change swimming to one race for each distance. Take out all the different styles, you shouldn't be able to win multiple medals at one distance because there are five different strokes. The breaststroke is a resting stroke. I never saw the point of trying to see who can do a resting stroke the fastest. That's like saying with the 100M final there could be Hopping, Backwards, Normal, Sideways, and Tied Hands.


You had me until that last paragraph. Five different strokes? Resting stroke? Huh?

2013-02-15 8:27 AM
in reply to: #4623147

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

chris00nj - 2013-02-14 10:50 PM 

The breaststroke is a resting stroke.

The best thing ever written on a triathlon forum.

 

2013-02-15 9:13 AM
in reply to: #4623177

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics
kevinbe - 2013-02-14 10:43 PM

GomesBolt - 2013-02-14 3:24 AM Easy there Kevin. I wrestled Division I in college and played judo, sombo, boxing, and Mixed Martial Arts in the Marine Corps. I wrestled Freestyle and Greco in the offseason and my neck is still jacked up.

I know plenty of what I'm talking about.

Yeah, I did come off on a little rant in this thread.  Just a little dissapointed that they're dropping a sports highest stage away from those who spend the majority of their life to compete at it at the highest level.  It's not like wrestling is irrelevent to those who compete at it, and there are plenty of nations that have high level programs, same as gymnastics, and swimming.  Like those sports, the athletes who wrestle also train there a.. off to make and compete at the olympics. 

It's cool bro.  I just think both USA Wrestling and FILA have done a very poor job of trying to get their brand out there and promote the sport. 

You only see Wrestling by accident when you're channel surfing and happen upon it.  It's never promoted ahead of time and broadcast by a major station.  Then, when it is, the coverage does a poor job of explaining the sport.  "Why'd he just get 2 points?" If they explained the sport better and made a deal to broadcast it more often with someone, you could get more interest from the general public. 

I wonder if making them compete for 2020 wasn't a warning shot to the sport more than it was an actual decision to eliminate a sport.  But who knows what the IOC discusses in their meetings...

2013-02-15 9:48 AM
in reply to: #4619365

User image

Elite
3395
20001000100100100252525
Raleigh
Subject: RE: No more Wrestling in the Olympics

Next we'll have synchronized triathlon!

Seriously though, I have never liked any activity with scores for style (I call them activities as I do not consider them sports). That includes figure skating, gymnastics, etc. There are incredible athletes in these activities but the entire thing is too subjective.

Trampoline, dressage, rhythm anything are dumb. Some of these seem to be made up for the Olympics. I know badmitten is huge around the world, but I do not watch. That does not mean it needs to be dropped.

Golf should not be part of the Olympics. The pro golfers are going to move on to there next big tournament with millions of dollars on the line like nothing happened at the Olympics. Whereas the Olympics are the pinnacle in wrestling!

FWIW: I do not consider whether the US is good at a sport as a criteria in my judgement. Team handball is an amazing sport to watch. We never see it because we stink at it. (It is sort of a cross between basketball and soccer).

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » No more Wrestling in the Olympics Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3